From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793624043; b=BHGa8XeEU8nxlv4Dtoq9Ac7m0GPWJVV69Gtwww3o7m6NqIil4urq5/5Xa+n4eE3GT1ee X6mX0cPBkzB81ig226ymuwbUuuglNfzUHitGEtI+0xcsZVylAZnILNw7nx6B53P1se7zR 8VvTemY3EnmtCWrwLU593N838S/L+pewCOBglf2iUIghplZQDO0uIkHm/cndqe1YYrcHH ZE8oBsElVJGxLYdRB/80pHDDR51jIHq2lYCVRlFjZaKWeV/rzc3mS+t1gvXYqE/oiqE8L iQ4oNN+3lGi+Edb3aRL3p7pL1aBF6LI/ZVBLAISDP1bOADIdizHutKWOBlMThw0KtxQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793624043; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=R4WIaVmgxMJzlsaERAlBqwLuDwVcuzfSzsQMDWtKV3E=; b=JnL6ZQkIF07BoBG1+BhNSOF5Oe5g2Wx8HEpMeNtsA/sGF1r+yBaYwzCrj9nhQyqANtX/ 6mpogXxg21Lt4dd6C7/TKNxHVPI9AkNXO5S9EqYRwhmIJ2+A2TCXQMkhAc+zhVNcFj7j4 S51ajoieL+XAZyjhR/KjA8EVUo0hfVWUjeRFE0jHtHBjEWUlHzVaIUvK8hY6w1Lxzs0Gx 9xVsyAopXG3K/0R++QcBMBSb5s+zzXGTTqmWVoU1/94CbDUO51KwJeqb2cu1i62+bhZgw Z7zvXLIHe/G+5x/GHnT3LfpqVVjO+i+YFkmLmHBnFRM7ZQ4J5XGk7bAU+qefE88je2Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=gEZwPl4T; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 912D7606A326 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2026 12:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=gEZwPl4T Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9CA6B1F00A16; Mon, 2 Nov 2026 12:54:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793624043; bh=R4WIaVmgxMJzlsaERAlBqwLuDwVcuzfSzsQMDWtKV3E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=gEZwPl4TVbKc5q4FYCAyZeuoqTY6Y24tf1qO8JAWaOIYy958WHuimh9510qLBX60y XajmSQb8IeNVWbmz71zxnjhRi1K5L/SXhpfWj8Ch+6Y+eQaJ6YkgZMX9RsMWxMfQLi u8YzG1gkKeItYtheviifTPtemOE0MfOk37GZ6omte7Hj+/Ax67+tZGzkWdUFPNQEpd +e1Xe9w1pJaH948d93qOBN4gMBw3ulavBI/xFSKVoxL6l0mhaJIY7s2j6/zU3fMNB+ XZQ72TQF3lnqaZW6rWK73+iPBrUoK45IPYMJveW+L87/vXqFCYmBlixqXCvRnZVw3a wXhD/7r9aHQXg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Maciej Fijalkowski Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com, stfomichev@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, tushar.vyavahare@intel.com, kerneljasonxing@gmail.com, bjorn@kernel.org, zuomao338@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/9] xsk: ZC mbuf fixes Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2026 12:54:02 +0000 Message-ID: <179362404207.3286.3886474571191338888@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261102124950.958345-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> References: <20261102124950.958345-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.