From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793716081; b=LCtoUBzR9fAQ4LHikW/iVgdY5/R+efGtXmToLN7r4VNXZ7/OMyYYcK02dVgrP4IFfHIE c7QuvKjxe/q+uDoNDnIwZOg9TWt8BJFMxHiPJ2yzs3HGtiwogjbFY+0IjBOwpb5Bws9hx 9rL/fvo2Uz8KFhylyADng+2VizmOauiKfmIW7tDDHPL2BSX0A77oCWG7K9/12VxZhVp1b Tp9T3EcwWfGLTEFEUtO8Ou9goPe0Pf3tBvRgY8RG9gysqovn4Jk6wDjyjH4IKYhZp4OJV yERA7TOEW2R+GEWOhJvZFHrtBeTL0HZZqm+NJ8+kLsfew7vfT+udm2Y6GT3i8XLYjmg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793716081; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=PJRu7W6/Or1we5Gv3BgoLEtby0D0Y0UGgfjBHfRc5+k=; b=sgCEzOG5MmlwroamKp6HsP5IgH649KiGgr5TeVMmM9eFBzB9VU40yezASGZuQKH7xnVz ist4wogupJ2YOvcZMVXs5wzXwPS9TVaYpaD7njqi7lMYFJm4Aa++VQDjUsJMtyKrBtAp2 2q08JcTntdRbpcqHMHr/VZJQ31oeuUMVuj4pup3/7da8p4QMD+AxM0/WBCGAiXR12QhaU b/hoicxz+63QOpDBAzMde6sfP4Ufpl40RYSsQ03DUWekpjISbYu+6j/JVY7Fm7ht3nzuB 1MLhTdvmO0CrY8ZOQfCNikOq3TVxZz8eKWfbuyhfxhuUfE/Lm1YHkUAckXwk4lTEHsQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=HHpjdexY; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D12D1606A328; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 14:28:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=HHpjdexY Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 732951F000C1; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 14:27:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793716080; bh=PJRu7W6/Or1we5Gv3BgoLEtby0D0Y0UGgfjBHfRc5+k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=HHpjdexYLv1LKFZhWNvbOPCNPUsD/VZW8osv5/BChV1k2ouAGtlQR9SQn5QMzOthq m058MRJH9UbvslLaBI1qYprnEAb8vklbQkkWKgqM/Npgil7PBBZAAGOM/gYC2e4srq rPcFraQzJMLo3j+FOTlKmjQbtfV9Xd/gd7YWIn8/3BJ3zXJCJNjUHtdy3R3ELgP197 lT0QIgG9IL6pFlvA0J/7Vn0b4Uv2Dlpc9L6O1HBJJuSxrNGQYxxgx+qK3FnWOD3K5L 2903gMFeOEbJvYRba/ie5qyjb5Sx1gCrtsdqtfjwmUJ8k8Cn3QHuJWrjGCfIeJAgzn 1ATTd+1lQLj9Q== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Antonio Quartulli Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, jasowangio@gmail.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, eperezma@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me, maheshb@google.com, peterpenkov96@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 0/2] tun: bound the NAPI receive queue Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2026 14:27:59 +0000 Message-ID: <179371607900.488859.488506175171813009@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261103142232.1869185-1-antonio@mandelbit.com> References: <20261103142232.1869185-1-antonio@mandelbit.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.