From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793792354; b=rb9+s5hd5Op2bh4lAVLBH8buREpQXohYyO9XsTnYMHXwYMwbROdkxHatCSBUjsDURpCK 28XWdMkm76NAONJLo0TSQIjEQROew2mOC/Za56F8GjfVYpRCcjxvYJ0quATm/zvFqOVzK OPMLWDixX37mLvmLTFPY3EXOmMhp5IA7s2Htk0wzXqtuEVNrBl5LPwzRfkt3Ec9ds3ivU XSsubmtRR64c2kSIwvAEtf7PIucaoLNmHZ8IcWHGHGt9MvuvO2XVBY1DIXjlRADKSWw5p vZAeJoYVvPfuYWGcO8vo/dJ95gUNgwG+BUsDJJIL19ELf+G+lfYLcg32aassWt5UVqg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793792354; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=b65pzJ5TnRWSzP7nj43qs8PY9qI0f+kdw1kbXZqXiCEdW3WRMGc6lEml8lW5AiQu8mHe lBPYXC9m9JwggIT1XK0mVwnwYLpvq3+gpHFoQd6KuUozHD80XIRGSSZshO4gI1xg4ki2C Het5stWkcdnkykje+6JjLmsUK5xbM3jFKp0cX6k+Vxd7EYGGISrpMUrzzTZsKAjDcEjP0 tdsWax/icEYy+0CSgRkA5jJFMEukpi2sGl7guaf825rfRXlG6Al/G/PMJ2xnGEEJwghpJ Kkxzsa5EiZpLjLsuIB4eIcsg9e3npefK3vjmTDyNMCGNypg7gb4I82y3Pg/9qTKQUwA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b="n12fr9o/"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32FEB606A32D for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2026 11:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=n12fr9o/ Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 319221F0093A; Wed, 4 Nov 2026 11:39:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793792353; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=n12fr9o/eLfRH66x7aUMM99yMJ8o11YgLqvYJSltxvo/lttYGQ96bIuq/jHpl+Xkv bQbYgYxFZrkBypIAf2FKY43tlNfZEKLPJ+HprQJcCe93Qlp0R6Lx6HjxomujtrOaxt kcB4we/H+nupAzCZi63W3Z+e/pjbazZoLNcOXPgn/u8pK1L2Az+PVIRJIDsdUK62vx 63QiGcU4mu6GnLqHTJIH3U7qAPRlfLFHyTHZamcRe5jljsmLenBW4s3GBwaJJj8yvB zy2ciSfwH3AYhu30fZn6VI4SiwcTpGwUpJtHT28pKus16SPAxyd2dyBkoF4/EDbF/l C6utxzNsZUjTg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Cc: "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Willem de Bruijn , Mahesh Bandewar , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Kyle Zeng Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipvlan: make outbound skb headers writable Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 11:39:12 +0000 Message-ID: <179379235268.488859.11510660996410063187@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261104113530.986664-1-edumazet@kernel.org> References: <20261104113530.986664-1-edumazet@kernel.org> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.