From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793883043; b=vHJpWZ+lqP+Mz868lTKRn+xGaYspGzLTF8HGkI52AUv5pX3+INgRHoZHooRsAZV2ziOV tG2T0UwQLqlE2tt5m+RCblRmqtdUoaPtFZZXuiHeZ7A8Ueho6P6CJR4klXFLgQaJ5aelm WEpYkbAWwQyoZg+hf0nCnTPey4340ALHTdwPK+W+rxxtUjm5BAKpjkiGD7yqBW1Pr4mOZ lHdqEeaAzKLuZwdL+2o0B7GWcB5sJHuZ76ojz8yWSV/EYzf/qavXjviGnP+jX3wO7irgw d93oI0uMzwaG9t2bAh4/FMlOkb4Y8o9vxQQhb7G3pWCnMKVNhkqlznoT9c2pdDNVWuA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793883043; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=NTxPHCyzLgOlLvWYRdXDMG+RAVGYYKap489a3eU1n1MvNmmSM5teZ1NF2rhB+k+FcSWJ dhqXCk6koUAflMMl0gr9967rtBj9gmSOxqgHad2AsiNx6cBZWWU7FItwHz1ae6GWXCMpx h04CMn1vSPpKTdmZw4BGO0u4mDles5IlrdtEVg7XdlFOYLHG6PMPOpisj0tCRH0sWqBtf AYDveqDBCnozxFp32ogzBjIMpO/GEo3b0KcmoCioMGw1aZZh6kYHO3jJMytD7ihXiAXSy eSj4j1hcJMSNxZlHG2cQXu1DeXkMTnv1MbYCKH4lxdYwgWVS7a9K+aHsdwX1Aw9c9aA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=OBWvYUzq; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6C24606D803; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 12:50:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=OBWvYUzq Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCCFF1F000C1; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 12:50:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793883042; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=OBWvYUzqRJtM9Gz3RLG3CzMj5lFVDynHqJj8GUCk/aaonDTGORkstdgAgUj2F0f7q ydDaexr9nHttbS6UhVdTHe9TdhPB1TEDMpwF5HO1hqEocZPvjJIkx7FPmTO+W9/nK4 neTQjDmwpd8kKTNXwNLmu0pFSdBParW7l9CeP6rpTx5kJFEDNtvhyXgi7D3gJhsHeP GdCK/gdck8oENgSPOAvSkFkU2ISF6p59tuZWUCIE8ZIUsMgsfiwESvrPipotYLhDiV MklVoKwFnZXHxOEfWZ0PlxD8CP5W15cdttuZqdhEtlI/TtCgjULlyeyueXaeFwH+0q L9aByPlFA2QTw== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, ja@ssi.bg Subject: Re: [PATCH net 01/12] netfilter: nft_reject: prevent unbounded recursion in output hooks Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2026 12:50:41 +0000 Message-ID: <179388304137.488859.13511108402287791390@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261105124536.1009301-2-pablo@netfilter.org> References: <20261105124536.1009301-1-pablo@netfilter.org> <20261105124536.1009301-2-pablo@netfilter.org> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.