From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793920635; b=XCV1hO03zo87F4cg541xk2L39MbUdGkUlm/ahSCkzJ8VaZQ1htXzqLELkECiNo5raI0t 7Avy1AOPHnFO4kF8UvIu+lK0iZeVcplqvJIHUgV2GwpBCUmxIsqp0ZWZhgP0TvgbWMP93 cmrk/A9bP6qHx2kheyfB7HokIgiO5T2ole436wIsIlII8vwVx00WV3BPXI42ie47BB7Bd OQ3yjWvanTlZgPqVjIT2lWicYV9MTXO0H2b6EMvAZNNwbhvLCM+/nSz3Vzq8jGStiu28s a8LXgpBB6Zo2CRVZR3e3KSdoBFSOOBfBWmCH1FteLMHHH6we5Z1ShkDigwhZhbvwotA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793920635; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=155gUMciIZj6rWmFFNs2/HmMoZ9VxbsKdqqynQvRUmzObRbvO6a9CgJ4FDHQdirzxxnD d5udUHXtZY6t3R1z6ggDbt6/0j/qmuZqKDEwII/aCsQ1VpP9KVfjWYcxQb9Mle7+kl5y3 Kv5lrDx0YJJjAQR7tod6r8QjE+OOUs4lzFtOtZCQRfEAZe+7A3z3q0vLOiwXPEbAXhOre hOa85IqyV3G2Og18LDYxjqeo7y/CFGJ9LwOH5WVQNZsi7cfA8OS0+EvdZNff9bZMtp7Ag RHx/f+dsGX7cAtGPVzOh59cuIvRZHOuYSKluTZh+XgGrV+Za8PNf9uKp1GSzTi4nMRw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=AKebRKlL; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9139A606A31B; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 23:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=AKebRKlL Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 907CB1F008A2; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 23:17:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793920635; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=AKebRKlLE57bRls3o6MyQYWTCLNlmGUA8lGIdcJ0nJZ0wNcoAKem4AVVDGpUVMzTq bd9z0aaOO6gxWfhVXl6JmEU0t5+DeJi0cFYcVBqItpG8LoKttPzeO57+EY43BTe1fX VawK2GMQhDD6doGTYQZ68dy5/0tow7aHdj3jzRCZfAYkHEUkLRyEnOQUJRGjHYSOd5 cS78vY0JdUIY1mDBGvd+wDVDWhhchxpGCGs8PluOcRq/Ph+USWawtBgrc1C3Badi2t WiUEWQQFAGA6JhjnGQxoLVR3+x4HhZi4ho5WfQeUTneSekNg53g/YkccfEBR/HF6Vy yOhL/OZbGpt7w== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Rosen Penev Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Jeff Garzik , David Gibson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ibm: emac: fix MR0 write in emac_rx_enable() Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2026 23:17:14 +0000 Message-ID: <179392063410.488859.17228254276936065586@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261105231417.119930-1-rosenp@gmail.com> References: <20261105231417.119930-1-rosenp@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.