Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: yishaih@nvidia.com
Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, leon@kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, saeedm@nvidia.com, tariqt@nvidia.com,
	mbloch@nvidia.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	edumazet@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	dtatulea@nvidia.com, moshe@nvidia.com, maorg@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 11/23] RDMA/mlx5: Add shadow FIFO infrastructure for UMR completions
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2026 20:24:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <179408309294.994134.208597027649974206@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103163949.1554-12-yishaih@nvidia.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found more severe
issue(s) in other patches of this series. This mail is only an FYI, in case
you want to address the nit picks below when you respin.

Low priority / nit picks for your consideration:

- [Low] The commit message's design premise is wrong.

--

RDMA/mlx5: Add shadow FIFO infrastructure for UMR completions

This commit adds a shadow FIFO of posted UMR contexts in adversarial
mode. A later patch can then check each UMR CQE against the oldest
pending request instead of trusting the CQE wqe_counter. Each context
also records the SQ producer counter it was posted at.

> The UMR QP is RC and signals every WR, so its completions arrive in
> posting order.

[Severity: Low]
Is this description accurate? The UMR QP does not look like an RC QP.

mlx5r_umr_resource_init() in drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/umr.c creates it
as a REG_UMR QP:

drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/umr.c:mlx5r_umr_resource_init() {
    ...
	init_attr.qp_type = MLX5_IB_QPT_REG_UMR;
    ...
}

to_mlx5_st() in drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/qp.c maps that type to its
own service type, not MLX5_QP_ST_RC:

	case MLX5_IB_QPT_REG_UMR:	return MLX5_QP_ST_REG_UMR;

mlx5r_umr_qp_rst2rts() also moves the QP to RTS without a remote QPN or
a path, which an RC connection would need.

The shadow FIFO design depends on in-order completion. The consumer added
later in the series, mlx5_ib_poll_one_umr(), treats any CQE whose
wqe_counter differs from the FIFO head as forged.

The in-order conclusion is probably still correct, since mlx5 send queues
complete in order and the generic poll path already relies on that when
it sets wq->tail = wq->wqe_head[idx] + 1. Only the stated reason seems
wrong.

Could the message say that the UMR SQ (a REG_UMR service type QP)
completes in posting order, instead of calling the QP RC?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20261103163949.1554-1-yishaih%40nvidia.com

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-07 20:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-03 16:39 [PATCH rdma-next 00/23] mlx5: Adversarial mode for confidential computing guests Yishai Hadas
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 01/23] net/mlx5: Add mlx5_trigger_health_work_force() Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 02/23] net/mlx5: Derive adversarial mode from CC guest memory encryption Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 03/23] net/mlx5: Add capability filtering in adversarial mode Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 04/23] net/mlx5: Add macros for reading log-based caps Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 05/23] RDMA/mlx5: Reject QP transport types not enabled by FW capability Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 06/23] RDMA/mlx5: Require IB_QPT_DRIVER for the DC vendor QP types Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 07/23] RDMA/mlx5: Derive mlx5_ib_adversarial_mode global from mlx5_core adversarial API Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 08/23] RDMA/core: Suppress kverbs_provider for adversarial_mode devices Yishai Hadas
2026-11-03 19:03   ` Jacob Moroni
2026-11-03 19:07     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-11-07 20:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 09/23] RDMA/mlx5: Remove duplicate mlx5_ib_umr_context struct Yishai Hadas
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 10/23] RDMA/mlx5: Introduce per-CQ poll_one hook in mlx5_ib_cq Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 11/23] RDMA/mlx5: Add shadow FIFO infrastructure for UMR completions Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 12/23] RDMA/mlx5: Verify UMR CQ polling against a hostile NIC Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 13/23] RDMA/mlx5: Keep the UMR QP failed once a forged CQE is detected Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 14/23] RDMA/mlx5: Block generic CQ poll path in adversarial mode Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 15/23] RDMA/core: Set the CQ comp_handler after its poll context is set up Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:24   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 16/23] RDMA/mlx5: Ignore completion events for a CQ without a handler Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:25   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 17/23] RDMA/mlx5: Validate EQE port and GSI port before indexing devr.ports[] Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:25   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 18/23] RDMA/mlx5: Validate firmware RQ/SQ state before sqrq_trans[] lookup Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:25   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 19/23] RDMA/mlx5: Clamp log_max_cq_sz shift in CQ size checks Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:25   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 20/23] RDMA/mlx5: Clamp log_max_* shifts in QP and WQ limit checks Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:25   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 21/23] RDMA/mlx5: Clamp log_max_* shifts in query_device and ucontext paths Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:25   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 22/23] RDMA/core: Report and enforce adversarial mode via GET_CONTEXT Yishai Hadas
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 23/23] RDMA/mlx5: Advertise adversarial mode via ib_device::adversarial_mode Yishai Hadas
2026-11-07 20:25   ` netdev-bot+sashiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=179408309294.994134.208597027649974206@kernel.org \
    --to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maorg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=moshe@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox