From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Weinberger Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mtd: Stop assuming mtd_erase() is asynchronous Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 22:58:56 +0100 Message-ID: <1794415.MYW8eb4nQC@blindfold> References: <20180212210311.23244-1-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> <20180212210311.23244-4-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Marek Vasut , Cyrille Pitchen , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Joern Engel , Robert Jarzmik , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Kyungmin Park , Artem Bityutskiy , Solarflare linux maintainers , Edward Cree , Bert Kenward , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Miqu To: Boris Brezillon Return-path: Received: from lilium.sigma-star.at ([109.75.188.150]:34706 "EHLO lilium.sigma-star.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932109AbeBLV5n (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:57:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180212210311.23244-4-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Montag, 12. Februar 2018, 22:03:09 CET schrieb Boris Brezillon: > None of the mtd->_erase() implementations work in an asynchronous manner, > so let's simplify MTD users that call mtd_erase(). All they need to do > is check the value returned by mtd_erase() and assume that != 0 means > failure. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger Thanks, //richard