From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
jgross@suse.com, sstabellini@kernel.org,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, fmancera@suse.de,
almasrymina@google.com, david.laight.linux@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
willemb@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 00/15] net: skbuff: follow-ups to the BUG_ON() removal
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 22:00:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179443441492.1663612.10817269880170067726.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104-b4-skbuff-bug-on-followups-v4-0-b7ffeb364f5d@toxicpanda.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2026 20:47:12 +0000 you wrote:
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261019-b4-skbuff-bug-on-followups-v1-0-41dbef50b9f7@toxicpanda.com/
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261021-b4-skbuff-bug-on-followups-v2-0-2aa780a03524@toxicpanda.com/
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261103-b4-skbuff-bug-on-followups-v3-0-54ad0ab57614@toxicpanda.com/
>
> v3->v4:
> - 1: the !sg && csum branch of skb_segment() returns -EFAULT instead of
> -ENOMEM when skb_copy_bits() fails, like the branch next to it. The
> new cases in 12 made that stand out. I kept Mina's Reviewed-by.
> - 12: run the nested and short skb cases without SG too (Willem).
> - 11: no code change. The commit message was wrong that the path
> without SG was fine before. Three of the new cases in 12 hit the NULL
> pointer dereference without SG if the list_skb check in the clone
> branch condition is taken out, because the walk reads list_skb before
> it looks at SG.
> - Picked up Mina's Reviewed-by on 1 and Acked-by on 4, Willem's
> Reviewed-by on 11 and 12, and Juergen's Reviewed-by on 13.
> - No other changes, same base as v3.
> v2->v3:
> - 1, 2, 6: move the frag_list recursion into a noinline function, so
> that taking the address of a local there doesn't give the helpers a
> stack protector (Paolo). On x86_64 defconfig plus CONFIG_IP_SCTP
> none of skb_copy_and_csum_bits(), skb_checksum_full(),
> skb_crc32c_full() or the two wrappers has one now, and
> __ip_append_data(), __ip6_append_data() and skb_segment() are
> unchanged. The callers that pass a local do gain one. Besides the
> seven I listed on v2, that's __skb_gro_checksum_complete() and
> skb_checksum_help(), which are converted in this version, and
> skb_crc32c_csum_help().
> - 1: put the Fixes: tags back (Fernando, Sashiko). csump in the
> prototype, and drop the "Both of above in one bottle" comment
> (Fernando). skb_copy_and_csum_dev() zeroes the whole frame when the
> copy fails, since leaving the checksum alone doesn't guarantee a bad
> one (Sashiko).
> - 2, 6: the kernel-doc describes the unreadable check as it is, the
> wrappers don't blame unreadable frags for -EINVAL, and the commit
> messages say what changes for a failing frag_list member (Fernando,
> Sashiko).
> - 2: convert skb_checksum_help() too, as 6 does for its crc32c twin, and
> add Fixes: 20ddd0fd2fcd.
> - 3: convert __skb_gro_checksum_complete() too (Fernando, Sashiko).
> Take the skb off CHECKSUM_COMPLETE on failure. Otherwise conntrack,
> which doesn't drop on a bad checksum, leaves the pseudo-header sum in
> skb->csum and TCP's validation accepts the packet after all
> (Sashiko). Update the comments, and add Fixes: 65249feb6b3d.
> - 4: the commit message was wrong that devmem TX reaches this checksum.
> Its skbs carry SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG, so the segment fails to linearize
> first. The patch is hardening, and the commit message says so now.
> - 5: when the tail can't be checksummed but what's left can be read,
> set CHECKSUM_NONE instead of failing the trim, which dropped packets
> that used to be accepted (Sashiko). Retitled, and add Fixes: tags.
> - 7, 8: add the Fixes: tags for the original commits, and correct the
> history in 8's commit message (Sashiko). 8 also says what it takes
> to reach the memcpy().
> - 7: reject a negative @len or @hlen on entry. The reorder left nothing
> ahead of the skb_put(), which panics on one.
> - 8: the truesize check refuses the coalesce instead of only warning,
> and runs before the head is stolen. With len unsigned and nothing
> else, an skb with a len above INT_MAX went from refused to coalesced.
> - 9: check data_len > len directly and zero the frame. The old check
> missed CHECKSUM_PARTIAL (Sashiko). Retitled.
> - 10: drop both len > 0 tests, and correct what the commit message says
> they covered (Sashiko).
> - 9, 10: drop the Fixes: tags. Both problems are older than the commits
> the tags named, and neither has a known trigger.
> - 11: Willem, this one changed again after you OK'd the walk up front.
> A nested frag_list is only one way for the walk to run out of members.
> A len that counts bytes the skb doesn't hold gets to the same NULL
> pointer dereference, and the walk up front doesn't catch that. So the
> patch now checks for a NULL list_skb in the three places where the
> walk moves on to it, and that's all it does: no pass up front, which
> also takes care of the cost you pointed out for BIG TCP, and none of
> v2's skb_has_frag_list() tests. You asked on v2 whether the first two
> checks were needed. For a nested frag_list they weren't, for this
> they are. 12 has a case for each, and taking any one of the three
> checks out brings the oops back. The path without SG is left alone
> again. The commit message says that IP reassembly does nest
> frag_lists, just not on GSO skbs (Sashiko). Retitled.
> - 12: add four cases for a len that counts bytes the skb doesn't hold.
> Retitled.
> - 13: correct what the commit message says about when bounce_skb() runs
> and when skb_copy_bits() fails.
> - 14: update the comment above skb_nsg() (Sashiko).
> - 15: one more stale comment, in net_test.c.
> - Picked up Fernando's Reviewed-by on 4. Dropped Mina's on 1 and
> Fernando's on 2, since the frag_list loop moved in both, and Willem's
> on 12, since it grew.
> - Shortened the commit messages.
> - Rebased onto current net-next.
> v1->v2:
> - skb_segment(): check each frag_list member as the walk takes it,
> instead of an extra pass over the frag_list up front (Willem).
> - KUnit test: braces around the suppressed skb_segment() call (Willem),
> and the comment update for the non-uniform case moved into the same
> patch (Mina).
> - Picked up Willem's Reviewed-by and Mina's Acked-bys.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,v4,01/15] net: skbuff: make skb_copy_and_csum_bits() report unreadable frags
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/23fe6ac2e97a
- [net-next,v4,02/15] net: skbuff: add skb_checksum_full() that reports failure
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/2a1e46c16105
- [net-next,v4,03/15] net: skbuff: fail checksum validation when the skb can't be checksummed
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/3fe3f8beef7e
- [net-next,v4,04/15] net: skbuff: fail segmentation when a segment can't be checksummed
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/7fec569df355
- [net-next,v4,05/15] net: skbuff: drop hw csum if trim can't checksum tail
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/05938d3edbdb
- [net-next,v4,06/15] net: skbuff: add skb_crc32c_full() that reports failure
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/b8f3a11ff453
- [net-next,v4,07/15] net: skbuff: let skb_zerocopy() copy a short skb without head_frag
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/86cc1a8a942b
- [net-next,v4,08/15] net: skbuff: make skb_try_coalesce()'s len unsigned
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/b242a00c2bc3
- [net-next,v4,09/15] net: skbuff: reject data_len > len in copy_and_csum_dev
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/3133a780ef89
- [net-next,v4,10/15] net: skbuff: reject a negative length in skb_copy_and_csum_bits()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/2173a320e20d
- [net-next,v4,11/15] net: skbuff: don't run off frag_list in skb_segment()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e447e46ce976
- [net-next,v4,12/15] net: test the skb layouts skb_segment() refuses
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/7d02a2b23764
- [net-next,v4,13/15] xen-netfront: don't BUG() when skb_copy_bits() fails in bounce_skb()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ece597f62085
- [net-next,v4,14/15] net/tls: don't BUG() on leftover length in __skb_nsg()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e021a72ee9cb
- [net-next,v4,15/15] net: update comments that still describe the skb BUG_ON()s
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/c0073ae6e9d3
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 20:47 [PATCH net-next v4 00/15] net: skbuff: follow-ups to the BUG_ON() removal Josef Bacik
2026-11-04 20:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 01/15] net: skbuff: make skb_copy_and_csum_bits() report unreadable frags Josef Bacik
2026-11-04 20:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 02/15] net: skbuff: add skb_checksum_full() that reports failure Josef Bacik
2026-11-04 20:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 03/15] net: skbuff: fail checksum validation when the skb can't be checksummed Josef Bacik
2026-11-04 20:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 04/15] net: skbuff: fail segmentation when a segment " Josef Bacik
2026-11-04 20:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 05/15] net: skbuff: drop hw csum if trim can't checksum tail Josef Bacik
2026-11-04 20:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 06/15] net: skbuff: add skb_crc32c_full() that reports failure Josef Bacik
2026-11-04 20:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 07/15] net: skbuff: let skb_zerocopy() copy a short skb without head_frag Josef Bacik
2026-11-04 20:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 08/15] net: skbuff: make skb_try_coalesce()'s len unsigned Josef Bacik
2026-11-04 20:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 09/15] net: skbuff: reject data_len > len in copy_and_csum_dev Josef Bacik
2026-11-04 20:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 10/15] net: skbuff: reject a negative length in skb_copy_and_csum_bits() Josef Bacik
2026-11-04 20:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 11/15] net: skbuff: don't run off frag_list in skb_segment() Josef Bacik
2026-11-04 20:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 12/15] net: test the skb layouts skb_segment() refuses Josef Bacik
2026-11-04 20:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 13/15] xen-netfront: don't BUG() when skb_copy_bits() fails in bounce_skb() Josef Bacik
2026-11-04 20:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 14/15] net/tls: don't BUG() on leftover length in __skb_nsg() Josef Bacik
2026-11-04 20:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 15/15] net: update comments that still describe the skb BUG_ON()s Josef Bacik
2026-11-11 22:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179443441492.1663612.10817269880170067726.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=fmancera@suse.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox