From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794492137; b=DeIYJSwbyvmqphm2jWG+yPyQiSY9Yff+vgUl9khBgVF0fIivwOF3VADlWKmbaj0ubroc XY44N6GHSZpUW+/Gr8XEyF9hqsOcBiVAfN3s2ap63xGCrtz/qwXbjJsKGPE0Wzohbbx43 gwVmbb5LtT3j08GnSG2oAWl+bHoVFOtxAyn/JUEh7IICwgoEC6GQKo064fdMyl6+2Saim wkRJ56yfrjBRMWg46ZV1GS1gJcl9PhhimOON0lCaN7v9oJ8FFLLlnnfMF7mATNlBCyclk DGfDSIj3R2MO0XMsRS36YnDHB3u2JXk3HXO3uDKOKqSz49s3itxpY9gOwfMYxwAVe+g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794492137; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=80POjU5WP6ctS0DqN7hA/63JAQ8Agh1hTny2C1kJcvk=; b=OGeYaZ6HMVQkBCuxKI7YcJ1FEQ2WMfwGOoxt+UmcTUrC3Y3giT1qo2vK3HMqPtv0pPfd jWRNwvrH3exDHy1sSuVl/pCTSnxfmFEAn5UwJyoBidlxYpeXY38U/XUQmQ3e4DDK4bEng NPT4JRE+lQbdk0VanBR6SuwUOj/joB33krEmNnBpRA2CjxC+3MXrQPR3RcqAmy46TY9Kx WvYXN49ACNG6oRUcumxyu99Nc6GnWLreNlULDC4M2ySGaD6BOH1SmFFM8/+wpFZ/dq2j8 88R9SEPsyfGcs5ag0El/gTxKoKWedEr9sDwML2J+y9OPd/LxlV/SCgEETJGC5SDPpVA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=YyCNKNBp; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14586606A330; Thu, 12 Nov 2026 14:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=YyCNKNBp Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6EF71F00A05; Thu, 12 Nov 2026 14:02:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794492136; bh=80POjU5WP6ctS0DqN7hA/63JAQ8Agh1hTny2C1kJcvk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=YyCNKNBpysLCemDZZfCc/F7vDencDP1Pi2Tlq8tELy9rXkatBVzAOHrqGzPLREvTv 3EugFEpVaEx7gw+p9pYcraR8NCmVJLrdZDrKRneUbsK5aYwHyQ7u6o/5z2ONY5H+uC Vi3tib2d8pdZFDNQd1Ih6P5gm89J+D2Eq920ss5gB8muXviyaCVbZZwYDPgxAuJD/0 KX19mbNrh7ropLv8yEQJyulvRHQedqHidDk4byAha0nHUVldjghZoi2fOn2J8BJuLU KFsmuffgEt7ykLEIKgrKJ3xsDcItZlX5u2RGnH59NXUjpC+Q1YLBrE0V9GmuDWBX3v g9Xmlwvw3C54w== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Guangshuo Li Cc: Felix Fietkau , Lorenzo Bianconi , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: Fix potential PPE hash table leak Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 14:02:15 +0000 Message-ID: <179449213543.2168702.9560735261651362363@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261112-88a3a7ff32-net-mtk@mail.sdu.edu.cn> References: <20261112-88a3a7ff32-net-mtk@mail.sdu.edu.cn> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.