From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794583674; b=O5Nu8sQtJ8SRLS6k9COJnwa7rq96/pW1Tbd1P0PJIhep80/eYCIOKL4zB9uPD81OkrPI Eph9+uEKqFN8dGNnElyoTcOXIwWpM8YRpfg7Q0fU+9q0dCVYsJEqZIGfSp00MR/eje2Oy USTsdO7+wtMO/CMijjG8WRfRYzastwkF9ulhhp3QWgdXNYovoeN6ffR2HqYmLGmdIwpWH KxxQszoUv1jUSUnz18SRhCp5K6oP66LXyrDNXBBWKBnywJnL9F6SaDxkbs4iyz7obfOQP QCIXpT/89ymOv1OSHDbPJTtGk8z/mYY0NbDZs2xmC9MRExaNrq8u+LbH9wLgRELg/4A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794583674; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=oVTc5I6nKpBiLsItkBZmeShBR8ASpkDeEBpnWBZ++aw=; b=m6F3t6n3XYiMNFEoaj8kMDwHpHc8hJNYjROiUWYAxAuz/u1Ei5s//SF15YyU7QNhh7/6 wdILSK8hD1UQJGb56zaekRHHsmN4UoKXltJ2YpPiREgtH5sUL7Om7Bg5otm5Qp+LoJTL3 Rev0GIxN51VTHIjxAAREizDk7H8qjxuva4pYkAc9kzS/W4D9cUFdVb8cesOz/J+kFO/UE gF+JXFdZRXyUK0FAwBbm5dsESAiOsf+f4sGJBC1UAZ5kuzF9C9nEcVUlOgbZAGxBXS7+B eYT7O4RghRyHDA8dujnnkyYMEs7VuYMBXWKno6kydGdlHUoJCNKBQgJ/5z2VVC27fPA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=obM15AJ9; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12538606A323; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 15:27:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=obM15AJ9 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 235AF1F000C4; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 15:27:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794583673; bh=oVTc5I6nKpBiLsItkBZmeShBR8ASpkDeEBpnWBZ++aw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=obM15AJ90mGlXY/jE5a+ZdaDpkOl09kD4/+UEDD4fs3RMqLfyai7TDkxlo5ytFngD lWeFQgTP8x228dv+DxTVIzxtOEtBciMIvLOdq8wc8cjDHX7doFqgFN0Ou5iVOYnNd/ Bjun3K6a48m4jKMfn2e0sWnoLEaIgzMEgkDua2AkdIMCo/N7faKrLk7711OjMO91eJ 0jdOMgannOdxAj6X4GWFpGz9J+sDZwW19wG9y7nct4vVovsQ2H+f5ylB3iWeO5nYQL mD/drX6lP1j3xSm7iZQD0g0VF0kXa/aUh7nW4+JjNgjOCNhrlhK4XOUXx0Wfxnr7M5 FdFsPV8k4fjFg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Tariq Toukan Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni , Akiva Goldberger , Gal Pressman , Leon Romanovsky , open list , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Mark Bloch , Saeed Mahameed , Shay Drory , Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5: IFC, enlarge active_port field to support 8 port LAG Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 15:27:52 +0000 Message-ID: <179458367272.2168702.15400963269849864687@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261112182940.3655773-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> References: <20261112182940.3655773-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by LLM and not proven at runtime). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or kernel messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.