From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794773311; b=cAqVa48y/R2GkhFST4e0YkrXLvEO+kt62A+hKukdieI8pZOS8Hz8stA7bMSru4/45dc3 kg3oBer9PgUMFTIUp2oSutZBSp1VroT99fVRSrWVRjr7QLyIuFaoLqJYBjpoV+S8nffYe IAv8iy+zfktE7qMKZeayBu0v9q0xvdh73mZ22LplNa/fHsml0CgA3JKRRukEDM5I9l5iJ WzHRiTpWONA+forE2hQb3LMFdph0ccOxg1O0c2DmR/IHsq5aPb02FSLdhgj6mNkFMNRRk q9QxnKMjadiGEnHsgw40A05OI9Xh8/0v5rmDelgmqbRiUoO4CAAsrRvCsDOVmPnUPeg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794773311; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Ps3dmenyy5Kz+Ld8FFyPnRbKN1BblcpmGxOsdgzLlkg=; b=eMIiVgWa+caB7/jAKtbaBsoH4Htb2ujZlHYe8MDTE+PpUxczyUZ811/4HBlVFdEQhw2A nxUVHIYeTfyAfjJFosk09rUkD0hsYwibxS2S7fqwW3P36xo9WQJfA0rtfce+XnhO4uW5h GEefjVMc9KbJIe1Z5sAjMhD2cCpG1u5GISSkCKGrLYmfOGpdIg2hHIOt80NI0SPWrXv/s fZUSBiBZXPz2qhFgnQJ7io4EcUNrZDGcp3pAj7WUjVOBL6hgwKbytbVREgq+XtwlJgdYX 10kMnwZ9MWYI6VWd+a9BESY4fQsJQBbVr2d2DanfvbiYdZIOuW1fdvGWfXV+LW9FpGw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=PUUXU4Uh; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3424A606A323; Sun, 15 Nov 2026 20:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=PUUXU4Uh Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1198A1F000C4; Sun, 15 Nov 2026 20:08:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794773310; bh=Ps3dmenyy5Kz+Ld8FFyPnRbKN1BblcpmGxOsdgzLlkg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=PUUXU4UhUTpmSfuqQVtkAn3GSkXbAMz4xG9bOorX1wr9N9B4WJwx6oRylV/gqLpKn Hl9llBfrG4JwE1uY65jujAOYNw14YMdT5JTc4OR/l3SbrnIPMS+I3RFD5mh0YNUnYL NjOdsR0DW1EFszeLu5y1Z1IlWkvqbMHiO88o/+kOOGzm5FDf60pSHZNKRVV800igMO 1c8+jZP+fGQygoT7hc6eLAXEkur9zOIFeBB22MKaR7OIQEzHOqXpsTgvZ2bGOp1L6k 04c9e9ytrq1llwUU78fOF1njGB0XRTXEqEwq0BezEzENk51CBgOCXsFwNmYI3kdkoO k4D3gPhSSPvCA== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Xia Yan Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev, David Heidelberg , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Thierry Escande , Samuel Ortiz , Samuel Ortiz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yana06070@163.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] NFC: digital: fix target leak after Type 1 Tag discovery Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 20:08:29 +0000 Message-ID: <179477330961.3291.17907063104926717829@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <1794705795184.22628.49502335540847234602.nfc-t1t-v2@cmss.chinamobile.com> References: <1794705795184.22628.49502335540847234602.nfc-t1t-v2@cmss.chinamobile.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by LLM and not proven at runtime). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or kernel messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. *IMPORTANT*: If you do repost (for other reasons) - please include the relevant info in the cover letter or commit messages. -- The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.