Re: [PATCH] tcp: assign the sock correctly to an outgoing SYNACK packet

Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09T15:07:06Z

On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 10:52 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:

>
> Perhaps I'm misunderstanding, but these comments above only apply if we were
> to increase the size of the sk_buff struct, yes? What I proposed, replacing
> "secmark" with a blob, does not currently change the size of the sk_buff
> struct so the performance and memory usage should remain unchanged as well.
>

If blob size is 4 bytes, thats fine.

If not, read again my mail.