From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Johnson Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: ipv6_addr_type() doesn't know about RFC4193 addresses Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:00:43 -0400 Message-ID: <18088.57675.352324.783405@zeus.sw.starentnetworks.com> References: <18087.57717.495366.413571@zeus.sw.starentnetworks.com> <46A8D837.1030400@simon.arlott.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, Srinivas Akkipeddi To: Simon Arlott Return-path: Received: from [12.38.223.190] ([12.38.223.190]:26748 "EHLO mail.sw.starentnetworks.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933005AbXGZSBG (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:01:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46A8D837.1030400@simon.arlott.org.uk> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Simon Arlott writes: > But ULA's scope isn't global, shouldn't it be IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_ORGLOCAL ? Isn't ORGLOCAL defined for multicast only? rfc4193 section 3.3 says: > 3.3. Scope Definition > By default, the scope of these addresses is global. That is, they > are not limited by ambiguity like the site-local addresses defined in > [ADDARCH]. -- Dave Johnson Starent Networks