From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/5] netlink: remove NLA_NESTED_COMPAT Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 16:56:17 +0200 Message-ID: <1811E905-CD9B-4346-AF17-CE9DBEBBE4F6@sipsolutions.net> References: <20180919194905.16462-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <20180919194905.16462-2-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <15cc8087b97d4b8693fad397b27f4d10@AcuMS.aculab.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: David Ahern , Johannes Berg To: David Laight , "linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <15cc8087b97d4b8693fad397b27f4d10-1XygrNkDbNvwg4NCKwmqgw@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org >> @@ -172,7 +172,6 @@ enum { >> NLA_FLAG, >> NLA_MSECS, >> NLA_NESTED, >> - NLA_NESTED_COMPAT, >> NLA_NUL_STRING, >> NLA_BINARY, >> NLA_S8, >... > >Is it safe to remove an item from this emun ? I believe it is, since it's not part of uapi. At least as long as you recompile all netlink policies afterwards. johannes -- Sent from my phone.