From: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, andy@greyhouse.net,
weiyongjun1@huawei.com, yuehaibing@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,v3] bonding: use WARN_ON instead of BUG in alb_upper_dev_walk
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 12:34:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18323.1700080449@famine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231115174955.GV74656@kernel.org>
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 03:22:39PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 12:55:37PM CET, shaozhengchao@huawei.com wrote:
>> >If failed to allocate "tags" or could not find the final upper device from
>> >start_dev's upper list in bond_verify_device_path(), only the loopback
>> >detection of the current upper device should be affected, and the system is
>> >no need to be panic.
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
>> >---
>> >v3: return -ENOMEM instead of zero to stop walk
>> >v2: use WARN_ON_ONCE instead of WARN_ON
>>
>> Yet the WARN_ON is back :O
>
>Hi Jiri,
>
>I think the suggestion was to either:
>
>1. WARN_ON_ONCE(); return 0; <= this was v2
>2. WARN_ON(); return -ESOMETHING; <= this is v3
>(But not, WARN_ON(); return 0; <= this was v1)
>
>And after v2 it was determined that the approach taken here in v3 is
>preferred.
>
>So I think this patch is consistent with the feedback given by Jay
>in his reviews so far.
Sigh, the more I look the more complicated this gets.
Anyway, I was previously thinking we're ok with WARN_ON if the
return is non-zero to terminate the device walk. The bond itself will
automatically call alb_upper_dev_walk at most once per second.
However, user space could do something like continuously change
the MAC address of the bond or initiate a failover in order to trigger a
call to alb_upper_dev_walk. This won't be rate limited, and if the
allocations there repeatedly fail, it would always trigger the WARN_ON.
So, I'm thinking now that instead of WARN_anything, we should
instead use something like
net_err_ratelimited("%s: %s: allocation failure\n", start_dev->name, __func__);
in bond_verify_device_path, and alb_upper_dev_walk doesn't do
any WARN at all, and returns failure (non-zero).
This is consistent with other similar allocation failures.
-J
>> >---
>> > drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 6 ++++--
>> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> >diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>> >index dc2c7b979656..21f1cb8e453b 100644
>> >--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>> >+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>> >@@ -984,8 +984,10 @@ static int alb_upper_dev_walk(struct net_device *upper,
>> > */
>> > if (netif_is_macvlan(upper) && !strict_match) {
>> > tags = bond_verify_device_path(bond->dev, upper, 0);
>> >- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tags))
>> >- BUG();
>> >+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tags)) {
>> >+ WARN_ON(1);
>> >+ return -ENOMEM;
>> >+ }
>> > alb_send_lp_vid(slave, upper->dev_addr,
>> > tags[0].vlan_proto, tags[0].vlan_id);
>> > kfree(tags);
>> >--
>> >2.34.1
>> >
>> >
>>
>
---
-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@canonical.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-15 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-15 11:55 [PATCH net-next,v3] bonding: use WARN_ON instead of BUG in alb_upper_dev_walk Zhengchao Shao
2023-11-15 14:22 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-11-15 17:49 ` Simon Horman
2023-11-15 20:34 ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2023-11-16 13:58 ` shaozhengchao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18323.1700080449@famine \
--to=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shaozhengchao@huawei.com \
--cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).