From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] bpf: Don't check for current being NULL
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:23:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1838884.qlCOuH57mO@blindfold> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQJzM3DH_gxAwo2mnGiv7bOsip1TAFF8YGPLx-dqSb1SPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Alexei,
Am Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2017, 00:06:08 CEST schrieb Alexei Starovoitov:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote:
> > current is never NULL.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
> > ---
> >
> > kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 12 ------------
> > 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> > index 3d24e238221e..e8845adcd15e 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> > @@ -120,9 +120,6 @@ BPF_CALL_0(bpf_get_current_pid_tgid)
> >
> > {
> >
> > struct task_struct *task = current;
> >
> > - if (unlikely(!task))
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
>
> really? in all context? including irq and nmi?
I would be astonished current is NULL in such a context.
To be sure, let's CC linux-arch.
IIRC I talked also with Al about this and he also assumed that current
cannot be NULL.
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-16 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-16 22:06 [PATCH 1/3] bpf: Don't check for current being NULL Alexei Starovoitov
2017-10-16 22:23 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2017-10-16 22:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-10-16 18:18 Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1838884.qlCOuH57mO@blindfold \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox