netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Dawson <matthew@mjdsystems.ca>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Macieira,
	Thiago" <thiago.macieira@intel.com>,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] datagram: When peeking datagrams with offset < 0 don't skip empty skbs
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 10:05:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1846443.VTclhqQinN@ring00> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502702846.8411.25.camel@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4132 bytes --]

On Monday, August 14, 2017 5:27:26 AM EDT Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 01:52 -0400, Matthew Dawson wrote:
> > Due to commit e6afc8ace6dd5cef5e812f26c72579da8806f5ac ("udp: remove
> > headers from UDP packets before queueing"), when udp packets are being
> > peeked the requested extra offset is always 0 as there is no need to skip
> > the udp header.  However, when the offset is 0 and the next skb is
> > of length 0, it is only returned once.  The behaviour can be seen with
> > the following python script:
> > 
> > #!/usr/bin/env python3
> > from socket import *;
> > f=socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM | SOCK_NONBLOCK, 0);
> > g=socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM | SOCK_NONBLOCK, 0);
> > f.bind(('::', 0));
> > addr=('::1', f.getsockname()[1]);
> > g.sendto(b'', addr)
> > g.sendto(b'b', addr)
> > print(f.recvfrom(10, MSG_PEEK));
> > print(f.recvfrom(10, MSG_PEEK));
> > 
> > Where the expected output should be the empty string twice.
> > 
> > Instead, make sk_peek_offset return negative values, and pass those values
> > to __skb_try_recv_datagram/__skb_try_recv_from_queue.  If the passed
> > offset
> > to __skb_try_recv_from_queue is negative, the checked skb is never
> > skipped.
> > After the call, the offset is set to 0 if negative to ensure all further
> > calculations are correct.
> > 
> > Also simplify the if condition in __skb_try_recv_from_queue.  If _off is
> > greater then 0, and off is greater then or equal to skb->len, then (_off
> > ||
> > skb->len) must always be true assuming skb->len >= 0 is always true.
> > 
> > Also remove a redundant check around a call to sk_peek_offset in
> > af_unix.c,
> > as it double checked if MSG_PEEK was set in the flags.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Dawson <matthew@mjdsystems.ca>
> > ---
> > 
> >  include/net/sock.h  | 4 +---
> >  net/core/datagram.c | 4 ++--
> >  net/ipv4/udp.c      | 4 ++++
> >  net/ipv6/udp.c      | 4 ++++
> >  net/unix/af_unix.c  | 8 +++++---
> >  5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> > index 7c0632c7e870..aeeec62992ca 100644
> > --- a/include/net/sock.h
> > +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> > @@ -507,9 +507,7 @@ int sk_set_peek_off(struct sock *sk, int val);
> > 
> >  static inline int sk_peek_offset(struct sock *sk, int flags)
> >  {
> >  
> >  	if (unlikely(flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
> > 
> > -		s32 off = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_peek_off);
> > -		if (off >= 0)
> > -			return off;
> > +		return READ_ONCE(sk->sk_peek_off);
> > 
> >  	}
> >  	
> >  	return 0;
> 
> You probably want/must also update sk_set_peek_off() to allow negative
> values, elsewhere this will break as soon as the user will do
> SOL_SOCKET/SO_PEEK_OFF.
I'm happy to do this either in this patch or as a second patch and make this a 
series, whatever the networking community prefers.

I'm actually surprised that only unix sockets can have negative values.  Is 
there a reason for that?  I had assumed that sk_set_peek_off would allow 
negative values as the code already has to support negative values due to what 
the initial value is.

> I'm wondering adding an explicit SOCK_PEEK_OFF/MSG_PEEK_OFF socket flag
> would help simplyifing the code: no need for negative offset; set such
> flag when SOL_SOCKET/SO_PEEK_OFF with a non negative value is called
> (and clear it when a negative value is used), forward such flag to
> __skb_try_recv_datagram/__skb_try_recv_from_queue and use it to select
> the proper peek behaviour.
The negative value is documented and supported for unix sockets, so I don't 
think we can just reject all negative values.  However, I do see a way to 
implement that while supporting user space sending negative values.  If that 
is preferred let me know and I'll see what I can make.

I assume that would make this patch target net-next?  Would it be possible to 
pull this into net so it can fix this regression for the next kernel release, 
while I work on getting the better solution finished?  I'm happy to to make 
__skb_try_recv_datagram/__skb_try_recv_from_queue accept the extra parameter 
so they don't see an offset less then 0 in this patch.

-- 
Matthew

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-14 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-14  5:52 [PATCH net] datagram: When peeking datagrams with offset < 0 don't skip empty skbs Matthew Dawson
2017-08-14  9:27 ` Paolo Abeni
2017-08-14 14:05   ` Matthew Dawson [this message]
2017-08-14 15:03     ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-14 15:31       ` Paolo Abeni
2017-08-15  1:35         ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-15 15:40           ` Paolo Abeni
2017-08-15 16:45             ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-15 17:00               ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-16  9:28                 ` Paolo Abeni
2017-08-16 15:18                   ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-16 20:20                     ` Paolo Abeni
2017-08-16 23:27                       ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-16 23:40                         ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-16 23:55                         ` Thiago Macieira
2017-08-17  0:10                           ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-17  9:15                         ` David Laight
2017-08-17 14:37                           ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-17 15:47                         ` Matthew Dawson
2017-08-17 16:45                           ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-15 18:17               ` Paolo Abeni
2017-08-14 16:06       ` Thiago Macieira
2017-08-14 16:33         ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-14 17:02           ` Thiago Macieira
2017-08-14 18:25             ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-14 18:33               ` Thiago Macieira
2017-08-14 18:46                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-14 18:58                   ` Thiago Macieira
2017-08-14 19:03                     ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-14 19:15                       ` Thiago Macieira
2017-08-14 19:39                         ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1846443.VTclhqQinN@ring00 \
    --to=matthew@mjdsystems.ca \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=thiago.macieira@intel.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).