From: Matthew Dawson <matthew@mjdsystems.ca>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Macieira,
Thiago" <thiago.macieira@intel.com>,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] datagram: When peeking datagrams with offset < 0 don't skip empty skbs
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 10:05:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1846443.VTclhqQinN@ring00> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502702846.8411.25.camel@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4132 bytes --]
On Monday, August 14, 2017 5:27:26 AM EDT Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 01:52 -0400, Matthew Dawson wrote:
> > Due to commit e6afc8ace6dd5cef5e812f26c72579da8806f5ac ("udp: remove
> > headers from UDP packets before queueing"), when udp packets are being
> > peeked the requested extra offset is always 0 as there is no need to skip
> > the udp header. However, when the offset is 0 and the next skb is
> > of length 0, it is only returned once. The behaviour can be seen with
> > the following python script:
> >
> > #!/usr/bin/env python3
> > from socket import *;
> > f=socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM | SOCK_NONBLOCK, 0);
> > g=socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM | SOCK_NONBLOCK, 0);
> > f.bind(('::', 0));
> > addr=('::1', f.getsockname()[1]);
> > g.sendto(b'', addr)
> > g.sendto(b'b', addr)
> > print(f.recvfrom(10, MSG_PEEK));
> > print(f.recvfrom(10, MSG_PEEK));
> >
> > Where the expected output should be the empty string twice.
> >
> > Instead, make sk_peek_offset return negative values, and pass those values
> > to __skb_try_recv_datagram/__skb_try_recv_from_queue. If the passed
> > offset
> > to __skb_try_recv_from_queue is negative, the checked skb is never
> > skipped.
> > After the call, the offset is set to 0 if negative to ensure all further
> > calculations are correct.
> >
> > Also simplify the if condition in __skb_try_recv_from_queue. If _off is
> > greater then 0, and off is greater then or equal to skb->len, then (_off
> > ||
> > skb->len) must always be true assuming skb->len >= 0 is always true.
> >
> > Also remove a redundant check around a call to sk_peek_offset in
> > af_unix.c,
> > as it double checked if MSG_PEEK was set in the flags.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Dawson <matthew@mjdsystems.ca>
> > ---
> >
> > include/net/sock.h | 4 +---
> > net/core/datagram.c | 4 ++--
> > net/ipv4/udp.c | 4 ++++
> > net/ipv6/udp.c | 4 ++++
> > net/unix/af_unix.c | 8 +++++---
> > 5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> > index 7c0632c7e870..aeeec62992ca 100644
> > --- a/include/net/sock.h
> > +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> > @@ -507,9 +507,7 @@ int sk_set_peek_off(struct sock *sk, int val);
> >
> > static inline int sk_peek_offset(struct sock *sk, int flags)
> > {
> >
> > if (unlikely(flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
> >
> > - s32 off = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_peek_off);
> > - if (off >= 0)
> > - return off;
> > + return READ_ONCE(sk->sk_peek_off);
> >
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
>
> You probably want/must also update sk_set_peek_off() to allow negative
> values, elsewhere this will break as soon as the user will do
> SOL_SOCKET/SO_PEEK_OFF.
I'm happy to do this either in this patch or as a second patch and make this a
series, whatever the networking community prefers.
I'm actually surprised that only unix sockets can have negative values. Is
there a reason for that? I had assumed that sk_set_peek_off would allow
negative values as the code already has to support negative values due to what
the initial value is.
> I'm wondering adding an explicit SOCK_PEEK_OFF/MSG_PEEK_OFF socket flag
> would help simplyifing the code: no need for negative offset; set such
> flag when SOL_SOCKET/SO_PEEK_OFF with a non negative value is called
> (and clear it when a negative value is used), forward such flag to
> __skb_try_recv_datagram/__skb_try_recv_from_queue and use it to select
> the proper peek behaviour.
The negative value is documented and supported for unix sockets, so I don't
think we can just reject all negative values. However, I do see a way to
implement that while supporting user space sending negative values. If that
is preferred let me know and I'll see what I can make.
I assume that would make this patch target net-next? Would it be possible to
pull this into net so it can fix this regression for the next kernel release,
while I work on getting the better solution finished? I'm happy to to make
__skb_try_recv_datagram/__skb_try_recv_from_queue accept the extra parameter
so they don't see an offset less then 0 in this patch.
--
Matthew
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-14 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-14 5:52 [PATCH net] datagram: When peeking datagrams with offset < 0 don't skip empty skbs Matthew Dawson
2017-08-14 9:27 ` Paolo Abeni
2017-08-14 14:05 ` Matthew Dawson [this message]
2017-08-14 15:03 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-14 15:31 ` Paolo Abeni
2017-08-15 1:35 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-15 15:40 ` Paolo Abeni
2017-08-15 16:45 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-15 17:00 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-16 9:28 ` Paolo Abeni
2017-08-16 15:18 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-16 20:20 ` Paolo Abeni
2017-08-16 23:27 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-16 23:40 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-16 23:55 ` Thiago Macieira
2017-08-17 0:10 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-17 9:15 ` David Laight
2017-08-17 14:37 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-17 15:47 ` Matthew Dawson
2017-08-17 16:45 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-15 18:17 ` Paolo Abeni
2017-08-14 16:06 ` Thiago Macieira
2017-08-14 16:33 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-14 17:02 ` Thiago Macieira
2017-08-14 18:25 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-14 18:33 ` Thiago Macieira
2017-08-14 18:46 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-14 18:58 ` Thiago Macieira
2017-08-14 19:03 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-14 19:15 ` Thiago Macieira
2017-08-14 19:39 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1846443.VTclhqQinN@ring00 \
--to=matthew@mjdsystems.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=thiago.macieira@intel.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).