From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Fastabend Subject: Re: More painful merges... Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:45:57 -0700 Message-ID: <18504140-3512-7e24-891c-ad9ba5ae9cec@gmail.com> References: <20171030.211551.790664985307439262.davem@davemloft.net> <20171030151429.mdcvyxflhmrtvfah@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jiri@mellanox.com To: Alexei Starovoitov , David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.83.42]:48773 "EHLO mail-pg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932128AbdJ3PqN (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:46:13 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id v78so11950193pgb.5 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:46:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20171030151429.mdcvyxflhmrtvfah@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/30/2017 08:14 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:15:51PM +0900, David Miller wrote: >> >> BPF and tc action bug fixes in 'net' caused some extremely >> painful merges with 'net-next'. >> >> Could the interested parties please take a look at 'net-next' >> and send me any necessary fixes, as I did the best that I >> could. > > bpf side is good. John, please double check as well. > Code looks good and all my tests passing successfully. Thanks, John