From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Franchoze Eric Subject: Re: RE: Re: Fwd: LVS on local node Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 01:37:30 +0400 Message-ID: <188211279834651@web111.yandex.ru> References: <20100723010102.121uPPJ1@mxfront8.mail.yandex.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Dumazet , wensong@linux-vs.org, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Graeme Fowler Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100723010102.121uPPJ1@mxfront8.mail.yandex.net> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org 23.07.10, 01:01, "Graeme Fowler" : > Hi > > Technically keepalived is not LVS. It's a monitoring/mgmt app which can manage an LVS according to health-check logic. LVS by itself cannot "detect" any form of service failure - it's a fancy router with special rules. > > Graeme. > Ah, ok. Then with iptables I can write keepalived app to insert/remove rules. Is there interface to iptables for dynamically turn on/off rules without inserting and removing them from the table?