From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Redefinition of struct in6_addr in <netinet/in.h> and
 <linux/in6.h>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 02:02:25 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <1893156080.7362411.1358406145231.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
References: <1358405953.2547.3.camel@cr0>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, vapier@gentoo.org,
        bhutchings@solarflare.com, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
        yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, tmb@mageia.org, eblake@redhat.com,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        libvirt-list@redhat.com, tgraf@suug.ch, schwab@suse.de,
        carlos@systemhalted.org
To: Jike Song <albcamus@gmail.com>
Return-path: <libc-alpha-return-36358-glibc-alpha=m.gmane.org@sourceware.org>
In-Reply-To: <1358405953.2547.3.camel@cr0>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-unsubscribe-glibc-alpha=m.gmane.org@sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org



----- Original Message -----
> 
> I see no reason, even although I don't know why it is 46 instead of
> 40.

Ok, for "0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:255.255.255.255".