From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: dsa: b53: mark as non-legacy
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:43:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18fa586c-9bfc-9c91-fbac-b3df35b496fc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YmJbzay/OiSAxYWF@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On 4/22/22 00:39, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 03:31:26PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Hi Russell,
>>
>> On 2/22/22 02:16, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>>> The B53 driver does not make use of the speed, duplex, pause or
>>> advertisement in its phylink_mac_config() implementation, so it can be
>>> marked as a non-legacy driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
>>> index 50a372dc32ae..83bf30349c26 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
>>> @@ -1346,6 +1346,12 @@ static void b53_phylink_get_caps(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>>> /* Get the implementation specific capabilities */
>>> if (dev->ops->phylink_get_caps)
>>> dev->ops->phylink_get_caps(dev, port, config);
>>> +
>>> + /* This driver does not make use of the speed, duplex, pause or the
>>> + * advertisement in its mac_config, so it is safe to mark this driver
>>> + * as non-legacy.
>>> + */
>>> + config->legacy_pre_march2020 = false;
>>
>> This patch appears to cause a regression for me, I am not sure why I did not
>> notice it back when I tested it but I suspect it had to do with me testing
>> only with a copper module and not with a fiber module.
>>
>> Now that I tested it again, the SFP port (port 5 in my set-up) link up
>> interrupt does not fire up when setting config->legacy_pre_march2020 to
>> false.
>>
>> Here is a working log with phylink debugging enabled:
>>
>> # udhcpc -i sfp
>> udhcpc: started, v1.35.0
>> [ 49.479637] bgmac-enet 18024000.ethernet eth2: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full -
>> flow control off
>> [ 49.488139] Generic PHY fixed-0:02: PHY state change UP -> RUNNING
>> [ 49.488256] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp: configuring for
>> inband/1000base-x link mode
>> [ 49.504062] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp: major config
>> 1000base-x
>> [ 49.511800] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp:
>> phylink_mac_config: mode=inband/1000base-x/Unknown/Unknown
>> adv=0000000,00000201
>> [ 49.527504] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp: mac link down
>> [ 49.535044] sfp sfp: SM: enter present:down:down event dev_up
>> [ 49.541006] sfp sfp: tx disable 1 -> 0
>> [ 49.544897] sfp sfp: SM: exit present:up:wait
>> [ 49.549509] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2: link becomes ready
>> udhcpc: broadcasting discover
>> [ 49.595185] sfp sfp: SM: enter present:up:wait event timeout
>> [ 49.601064] sfp sfp: SM: exit present:up:link_up
>> [ 52.388917] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp: mac link up
>> [ 52.396513] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp: Link is Up -
>> 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx
>> [ 52.406145] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): sfp: link becomes ready
>> udhcpc: broadcasting discover
>> udhcpc: broadcasting select for 192.168.3.156, server 192.168.3.1
>> udhcpc: lease of 192.168.3.156 obtained from 192.168.3.1, lease time 600
>> deleting routers
>> adding dns 192.168.1.1
>>
>> and one that is not working with phylink debugging enabled:
>>
>> # udhcpc -i sfp
>> udhcpc: started, v1.35.0
>> [ 27.863529] bgmac-enet 18024000.ethernet eth2: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full -
>> flow control off
>> [ 27.872021] Generic PHY fixed-0:02: PHY state change UP -> RUNNING
>> [ 27.872120] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp: configuring for
>> inband/1000base-x link mode
>> [ 27.887952] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp: major config
>> 1000base-x
>> [ 27.895689] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp:
>> phylink_mac_config: mode=inband/1000base-x/Unknown/Unknown
>> adv=0000000,00000201
>> [ 27.895802] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp: mac link down
>> [ 27.911945] sfp sfp: SM: enter present:down:down event dev_up
>> [ 27.923947] sfp sfp: tx disable 1 -> 0
>> [ 27.927835] sfp sfp: SM: exit present:up:wait
>> [ 27.932442] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2: link becomes ready
>> udhcpc: broadcasting discover
>> [ 27.978181] sfp sfp: SM: enter present:up:wait event timeout
>> [ 27.984056] sfp sfp: SM: exit present:up:link_up
>> [ 30.686440] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp: mac link up
>> udhcpc: broadcasting discover
>> udhcpc: broadcasting discover
>>
>> The mac side appears to be UP but not no carrier is set to the sfp network
>> device. Do you have any idea why that would happen?
>
> Oh, it's because setting that flag means we're wanting the PCS methods
> rather than the legacy MAC methods for an_restart and getting the PCS
> link state - so the patch in question was submitted too early (it
> should have been _after_ the conversion to PCS.)
Meh, sorry I was really slow on this and did not even connect the dots.
Indeed that is what it is.
>
> If we get the patch reverted in net-next, and then convert b53 to use
> PCS support, we'll then be putting the patch back, so I wonder if it
> would just make sense to apply the PCS conversion patch, possibly
> adding a comment in the commit message pointing out that this fixes
> the b53 legacy_pre_march2020 patch. Thoughts?
I just responded to your other patch "net: dsa: b53: convert to
phylink_pcs", so if we target that one for 'net' I think we should be
good to go.
Thanks!
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-22 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-22 10:14 [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: dsa: b53: convert to phylink_generic_validate() and mark as non-legacy Russell King (Oracle)
2022-02-22 10:15 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: dsa: b53: clean up if() condition to be more readable Russell King (Oracle)
2022-02-22 10:16 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: dsa: b53: populate supported_interfaces and mac_capabilities Russell King (Oracle)
2022-02-22 10:16 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: dsa: b53: drop use of phylink_helper_basex_speed() Russell King (Oracle)
2022-02-22 10:16 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: dsa: b53: switch to using phylink_generic_validate() Russell King (Oracle)
2022-02-22 10:16 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: dsa: b53: mark as non-legacy Russell King (Oracle)
2022-04-21 22:31 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-04-22 7:39 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-04-22 16:43 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2022-02-22 18:09 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: dsa: b53: convert to phylink_generic_validate() and " Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18fa586c-9bfc-9c91-fbac-b3df35b496fc@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).