* Problems with VSOCK?
@ 2013-02-20 22:11 Paul Moore
2013-02-20 22:19 ` Andy King
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2013-02-20 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy King; +Cc: netdev
Hi Andy,
I'm currently looking at the VSOCK implementation in netdev-next to determine
what we need in the way of LSM hooks and I ran into a few things which look
rather odd:
* net/vmw_sock/Kconfig
VMWARE_VMCI_SOCKETS depends on VMWARE_VMCI which doesn't look to be defined
anywhere, help? For what it is worth, removing the VMWARE_VMCI dependency
seems to fix things. Here is a simple patch to demonstrate the problem:
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/Kconfig b/net/vmw_vsock/Kconfig
index b5fa7e4..7c72881 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/Kconfig
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/Kconfig
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ config VSOCKETS
config VMWARE_VMCI_VSOCKETS
tristate "VMware VMCI transport for Virtual Sockets"
- depends on VSOCKETS && VMWARE_VMCI
+ depends on VSOCKETS
help
This module implements a VMCI transport for Virtual Sockets.
* [include/]linux/vmw_vmci_defs.h
* [include/]linux/vmw_vmci_api.h
* [include/]linux/vm_sockets.h
This header files are included in vmci_transport_notify.h, and perhaps others,
but don't seem to be present in the tree. There may be others, these are just
the first ones the compiler stumbled across. Perhaps a missing git-add
command?
* struct vmci_datagram
I can't find where this is defined, yet it is used in various places,
including as a member in struct vmci_transport_packet. Likely related to the
missing header files.
* vmci_datagram_send(struct vmci_datagram *) {guessing at the prototype}
Same problem, I can't find where this is defined.
Perhaps I'm just being particularly stupid today (my apologies if that is the
case), but I've refreshed my local git repository a few times now and double
checked the mailing list and I haven't found anything. Can you provide some
help here?
Thanks,
-Paul
--
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Problems with VSOCK?
2013-02-20 22:11 Problems with VSOCK? Paul Moore
@ 2013-02-20 22:19 ` Andy King
2013-02-20 22:28 ` Paul Moore
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andy King @ 2013-02-20 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Moore; +Cc: netdev
Hi Paul,
> I'm currently looking at the VSOCK implementation in netdev-next to determine
> what we need in the way of LSM hooks and I ran into a few things which look
> rather odd:
>
> * net/vmw_sock/Kconfig
>
> VMWARE_VMCI_SOCKETS depends on VMWARE_VMCI which doesn't look to be defined
> anywhere, help? For what it is worth, removing the VMWARE_VMCI dependency
Ah, I think this is the same problem someone else had a few days ago. VMCI
came in via Greg's char-misc-next tree, and it hasn't merged into Dave's
tree yet. But the top-level linux-next tree now has all required modules:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=summary
Sorry about them coming in from different trees :/
Thanks!
- Andy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Problems with VSOCK?
2013-02-20 22:19 ` Andy King
@ 2013-02-20 22:28 ` Paul Moore
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2013-02-20 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy King; +Cc: netdev
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 02:19:42 PM Andy King wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> > I'm currently looking at the VSOCK implementation in netdev-next to
> > determine what we need in the way of LSM hooks and I ran into a few
> > things which look rather odd:
> >
> > * net/vmw_sock/Kconfig
> >
> > VMWARE_VMCI_SOCKETS depends on VMWARE_VMCI which doesn't look to be
> > defined
> > anywhere, help? For what it is worth, removing the VMWARE_VMCI dependency
>
> Ah, I think this is the same problem someone else had a few days ago. VMCI
> came in via Greg's char-misc-next tree, and it hasn't merged into Dave's
> tree yet. But the top-level linux-next tree now has all required modules:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=summary
>
> Sorry about them coming in from different trees :/
Okay, thanks, I'll grab a copy of the next tree and take a look. That makes
much more sense, I was finding it hard to believe that so much was missing :)
--
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-20 22:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-20 22:11 Problems with VSOCK? Paul Moore
2013-02-20 22:19 ` Andy King
2013-02-20 22:28 ` Paul Moore
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).