From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: robert@herjulf.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] pktgen update for net-next (2.6.32) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:41:05 +0200 Message-ID: <19110.31505.134937.813631@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <20090827235506.624381734@vyatta.com> <19110.17776.721680.242313@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: robert@herjulf.net, Stephen Hemminger , David Miller , Robert Olsson , netdev , Thomas Gleixner To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Return-path: Received: from atthis.its.uu.se ([130.238.7.58]:48770 "EHLO atthis.its.uu.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753240AbZIHNdz (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 09:33:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, robert@herjulf.net wrote: >> >> Sending different pkt-sizes at maxrate using one CPU-core (of eight) >> with ixgbe driver and Intel's 82598 chip. >> >> w. patch >> 64 4761904 3846153 >I can also measure a performance improvement. > Generator machine, AMD Phenom 9950 quad core, using a 10GbE Intel 82599 > NIC (6 port 10GbE from Hotlava Systems Inc.). > With patches: > ------------- > tx_pkt_sz: 64 TX-pps: 9426724 Impressive. 82599 seems fast. Didn't you report even higher number with other CPU's? Cheers --ro