From: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
donald.hunter@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tools: ynl: try to avoid the very slow YAML loader
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 12:21:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <191ecbc0a4f9b51b9ead8ba559d6a170@tipi-net.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ca7d6b6-1aeb-4e7b-9263-64f4b427d1ef@intel.com>
On 4.6.2026 02:17, Jacob Keller wrote:
> On 6/3/2026 4:35 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Jun 2026 15:08:46 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
>>> Hmm. I was a bit confused at first by the switch from safe_load to
>>> load.. but we're passing Loader as _yaml_loader which will either be
>>> CSafeLoader *or* the default SafeLoader, so we'll get the appropriate
>>> loader equivalent to what safe_load would have done, so there's no
>>> change. Ok
>>
>> Maybe I should have mentioned this in the commit msg. I was also super
>> confused by these APIs but IDK how much is this me not knowing Python
>> and how much it's special. AFAIU basically:
>>
>
> This is a pyyaml issue not a generic python one I think.
>
>> somewhere in pyyaml...
>>
>> def safe_load(file):
>> return load(file, Loader=SafeLoader)
>>
>> so safe_load() is just a "shorthand" for using SafeLoader, which
>> unlike
>> load()s default loader doesn't allow constructing real/binary Python
>> objects ?
>
> load() by default uses the generic Loader that supports the full spec
> and because of that is "unsafe":
>
> https://github.com/yaml/pyyaml/wiki/PyYAML-yaml.load(input)-Deprecation
>
> Basically, loading the full YAML spec on untrusted input is unsafe
> since
> it allows arbitrary execution.
>>
>> Why it doesn't default to the C one is beyond my understanding.
>
> Right. I'm not super familiar here as to how it ends up not defaulting
> to CSafeLoader, but probably its because its not always available.
That's correct. CSafeLoader is only available if libyaml-dev was present
when
pyyaml was built. Auto-enabling the libyaml bindings was requested a few
years
ago, but it stalled due to internals [1]. It would also require
reworking
safe_load() and others, which are atm hardcoded. Hence the usual
try/except
import pattern.
Anyway, the changes match the usual patterns.
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
[1] https://github.com/yaml/pyyaml/issues/437
Regards
Nicolai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-03 21:08 [PATCH net-next] tools: ynl: try to avoid the very slow YAML loader Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-03 22:08 ` Jacob Keller
2026-06-03 23:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-04 0:17 ` Jacob Keller
2026-06-04 10:21 ` Nicolai Buchwitz [this message]
2026-06-04 10:41 ` Donald Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=191ecbc0a4f9b51b9ead8ba559d6a170@tipi-net.de \
--to=nb@tipi-net.de \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox