From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: robert@herjulf.net Subject: Re: Diagnostic Monitoring Interface Monitoring (DOM) PATCH 0/5 for net-next-2.6 Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:21:25 +0100 Message-ID: <19213.22917.304623.902855@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <19211.4244.135603.458550@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <9929d2390911250018o777405ddk257605e7d0b16d17@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Robert Olsson , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Kirsher Return-path: Received: from smtp-1.sys.kth.se ([130.237.32.175]:44272 "EHLO smtp-1.sys.kth.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754400AbZKYQrd (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:47:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <9929d2390911250018o777405ddk257605e7d0b16d17@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jeff Kirsher writes: > Robert, to help get more eyes on this I have added it to my tree for > internal testing and review. Fine. The igb patch was tested with a 4-port 82576 board from Interface Masters but they forgot to mount the pull-up resistors for the I2C-bus on my prototype which took some weeks to debug. Anyway there are working boards now. About the the Intel brand 82599 board with fixed SFP's. I don't see any DOM support from them. It could be idea check if my reading from I2c is correct. Seems I'll have a SFP+ with DOM support soon. Cheers --ro