netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: e1000-devel <e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	'Linux Netdev List' <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [bisected regression] e1000e: "Detected Hardware Unit Hang"
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:37:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1951915.1kCMSXLj6g@storm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421342437.11734.79.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>

On Thursday, 15. January 2015 09:20:37 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > for the sake of completeness:
> > 1: hang
> 
> This is weird : This should have same effect then GRO off (at most one
> segment per packet)

I thought so, too. OTOH the code path was changed from
"goto merge" to "return -E2BIG". I didn't look at the code
what happens at the "merge" label.

> Could you try the following ?
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c index
> 38cb586b1bf42fa7a50e19f3e650e8c139788820..6d93facddab78f8db7000fddaa24322
> 651a0eae9 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -1264,7 +1264,7 @@ static bool e1000_clean_tx_irq(struct e1000_ring
> *tx_ring)
> 
>  	netdev_completed_queue(netdev, pkts_compl, bytes_compl);
> 
> -#define TX_WAKE_THRESHOLD 32
> +#define TX_WAKE_THRESHOLD (MAX_SKB_FRAGS * 3 + 2)
>  	if (count && netif_carrier_ok(netdev) &&
>  	    e1000_desc_unused(tx_ring) >= TX_WAKE_THRESHOLD) {
>  		/* Make sure that anybody stopping the queue after this
> @@ -5650,10 +5650,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t e1000_xmit_frame(struct sk_buff
> *skb, netdev_sent_queue(netdev, skb->len);
>  		e1000_tx_queue(tx_ring, tx_flags, count);
>  		/* Make sure there is space in the ring for the next send. */
> -		e1000_maybe_stop_tx(tx_ring,
> -				    (MAX_SKB_FRAGS *
> -				     DIV_ROUND_UP(PAGE_SIZE,
> -						  adapter->tx_fifo_limit) + 2));
> +		e1000_maybe_stop_tx(tx_ring, 3 * MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2);
>  	} else {
>  		dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
>  		tx_ring->buffer_info[first].time_stamp = 0;

I was just about to leave the office... and switched the test box back on.

Also reverted to vanilla 3.19-rc4+ and applied the above patch instead.
Still hangs. Grrr. More testing tomorrow.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-15 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-14 15:32 [bisected regression] e1000e: "Detected Hardware Unit Hang" Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-14 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 10:11   ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 14:43     ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 14:58       ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 15:25         ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 15:48           ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 16:00             ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 17:04               ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 17:20                 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 17:37                   ` Thomas Jarosch [this message]
2015-01-15 18:24                     ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-19 16:49           ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 14:59       ` Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-11 11:23         ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-02-11 11:34           ` Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-12 23:28             ` Brown, Aaron F
2015-02-13 16:14               ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-02-21  1:59                 ` Brown, Aaron F
2015-03-23 13:58                   ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-03-23 22:37                     ` Brown, Aaron F
2015-05-27 16:00                       ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-05-30  1:18                         ` Brown, Aaron F
2015-07-29  8:51                           ` Thomas Jarosch
2019-05-02 12:58                             ` Juliana Rodrigueiro
2015-02-12  1:18           ` nick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1951915.1kCMSXLj6g@storm \
    --to=thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com \
    --cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).