From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Andrey Zhadchenko <andrey.zhadchenko@virtuozzo.com>,
eperezma@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] vringh: replace kmap_atomic() with kmap_local_page()
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 22:12:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1980067.5pFmK94fv0@suse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEs6cW7LdpCdWQnX4Pif2gGOu=f3bjNeYQ6MVcdQe=X--Q@mail.gmail.com>
On martedì 14 marzo 2023 04:56:08 CET Jason Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 7:34 PM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
wrote:
> > kmap_atomic() is deprecated in favor of kmap_local_page().
>
> It's better to mention the commit or code that introduces this.
>
> > With kmap_local_page() the mappings are per thread, CPU local, can take
> > page-faults, and can be called from any context (including interrupts).
> > Furthermore, the tasks can be preempted and, when they are scheduled to
> > run again, the kernel virtual addresses are restored and still valid.
> >
> > kmap_atomic() is implemented like a kmap_local_page() which also disables
> > page-faults and preemption (the latter only for !PREEMPT_RT kernels,
> > otherwise it only disables migration).
> >
> > The code within the mappings/un-mappings in getu16_iotlb() and
> > putu16_iotlb() don't depend on the above-mentioned side effects of
> > kmap_atomic(),
>
> Note we used to use spinlock to protect simulators (at least until
> patch 7, so we probably need to re-order the patches at least) so I
> think this is only valid when:
>
> The vringh IOTLB helpers are not used in atomic context (e.g spinlock,
> interrupts).
I'm probably missing some context but it looks that you are saying that
kmap_local_page() is not suited for any use in atomic context (you are
mentioning spinlocks).
The commit message (that I know pretty well since it's the exact copy, word by
word, of my boiler plate commits) explains that kmap_local_page() is perfectly
usable in atomic context (including interrupts).
I don't know this code, however I am not able to see why these vringh IOTLB
helpers cannot work if used under spinlocks. Can you please elaborate a little
more?
> If yes, should we document this? (Or should we introduce a boolean to
> say whether an IOTLB variant can be used in an atomic context)?
Again, you'll have no problems from the use of kmap_local_page() and so you
don't need any boolean to tell whether or not the code is running in atomic
context.
Please take a look at the Highmem documentation which has been recently
reworked and extended by me: https://docs.kernel.org/mm/highmem.html
Anyway, I have been ATK 12 or 13 hours in a row. So I'm probably missing the
whole picture.
Thanks,
Fabio
> Thanks
>
> > so that mere replacements of the old API with the new one
> > is all that is required (i.e., there is no need to explicitly add calls
> > to pagefault_disable() and/or preempt_disable()).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Notes:
> > v2:
> > - added this patch since checkpatch.pl complained about deprecation
> >
> > of kmap_atomic() touched by next patch
> >
> > drivers/vhost/vringh.c | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> > index a1e27da54481..0ba3ef809e48 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> > @@ -1220,10 +1220,10 @@ static inline int getu16_iotlb(const struct vringh
> > *vrh,>
> > if (ret < 0)
> >
> > return ret;
> >
> > - kaddr = kmap_atomic(iov.bv_page);
> > + kaddr = kmap_local_page(iov.bv_page);
> >
> > from = kaddr + iov.bv_offset;
> > *val = vringh16_to_cpu(vrh, READ_ONCE(*(__virtio16 *)from));
> >
> > - kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
> > + kunmap_local(kaddr);
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1241,10 +1241,10 @@ static inline int putu16_iotlb(const struct vringh
> > *vrh,>
> > if (ret < 0)
> >
> > return ret;
> >
> > - kaddr = kmap_atomic(iov.bv_page);
> > + kaddr = kmap_local_page(iov.bv_page);
> >
> > to = kaddr + iov.bv_offset;
> > WRITE_ONCE(*(__virtio16 *)to, cpu_to_vringh16(vrh, val));
> >
> > - kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
> > + kunmap_local(kaddr);
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-15 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-02 11:34 [PATCH v2 0/8] vdpa_sim: add support for user VA Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-02 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] vdpa: add bind_mm/unbind_mm callbacks Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-14 3:39 ` Jason Wang
2023-03-16 8:17 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-02 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] vhost-vdpa: use bind_mm/unbind_mm device callbacks Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-14 3:48 ` Jason Wang
2023-03-16 8:31 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-16 10:11 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-02 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] vringh: replace kmap_atomic() with kmap_local_page() Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-14 3:56 ` Jason Wang
2023-03-15 21:12 ` Fabio M. De Francesco [this message]
2023-03-16 2:53 ` Jason Wang
2023-03-16 8:09 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-16 9:25 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2023-03-16 9:13 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2023-03-16 9:17 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-02 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] vringh: support VA with iotlb Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-03 14:38 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-03-07 9:31 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-16 16:07 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-17 2:53 ` Jason Wang
2023-03-17 9:49 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-03-17 11:25 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-14 4:53 ` Jason Wang
2023-03-16 8:38 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-02 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] vdpa_sim: make devices agnostic for work management Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-03 14:40 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-03-14 5:27 ` Jason Wang
2023-03-02 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] vdpa_sim: use kthread worker Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-02 15:30 ` Simon Horman
2023-03-02 15:48 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-05 11:21 ` kernel test robot
2023-03-14 5:31 ` Jason Wang
2023-03-02 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] vdpa_sim: replace the spinlock with a mutex to protect the state Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-14 5:29 ` Jason Wang
2023-03-14 5:31 ` Jason Wang
2023-03-16 8:42 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-02 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] vdpa_sim: add support for user VA Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-14 5:36 ` Jason Wang
2023-03-16 9:11 ` Stefano Garzarella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1980067.5pFmK94fv0@suse \
--to=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
--cc=andrey.zhadchenko@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).