From: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/9p: Initialize the iounit field during fid creation
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 16:48:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1984068.YOKu8ataPd@silver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220710141402.803295-1-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
On Sonntag, 10. Juli 2022 16:14:02 CEST Tyler Hicks wrote:
> Ensure that the fid's iounit field is set to zero when a new fid is
> created. Certain 9P operations, such as OPEN and CREATE, allow the
> server to reply with an iounit size which the client code assigns to the
> p9_fid struct shortly after the fid is created by p9_fid_create(). On
> the other hand, an XATTRWALK operation doesn't allow for the server to
> specify an iounit value. The iounit field of the newly allocated p9_fid
> struct remained uninitialized in that case. Depending on allocation
> patterns, the iounit value could have been something reasonable that was
> carried over from previously freed fids or, in the worst case, could
> have been arbitrary values from non-fid related usages of the memory
> location.
>
> The bug was detected in the Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 (WSL2) kernel
> after the uninitialized iounit field resulted in the typical sequence of
> two getxattr(2) syscalls, one to get the size of an xattr and another
> after allocating a sufficiently sized buffer to fit the xattr value, to
> hit an unexpected ERANGE error in the second call to getxattr(2). An
> uninitialized iounit field would sometimes force rsize to be smaller
> than the xattr value size in p9_client_read_once() and the 9P server in
> WSL refused to chunk up the READ on the attr_fid and, instead, returned
> ERANGE to the client. The virtfs server in QEMU seems happy to chunk up
> the READ and this problem goes undetected there.
>
> Fixes: ebf46264a004 ("fs/9p: Add support user. xattr")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
> ---
>
> v2:
> - Add Fixes tag
> - Improve commit message clarity to make it clear that this only affects
> xattr get/set
> - kzalloc() the entire fid struct instead of individually zeroing each
> member
> - Thanks to Christophe JAILLET for the suggestion
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220710062557.GA272934@sequoia/
>
> net/9p/client.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c
> index 8bba0d9cf975..371519e7b885 100644
> --- a/net/9p/client.c
> +++ b/net/9p/client.c
> @@ -889,16 +889,13 @@ static struct p9_fid *p9_fid_create(struct p9_client
> *clnt) struct p9_fid *fid;
>
> p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_FID, "clnt %p\n", clnt);
> - fid = kmalloc(sizeof(*fid), GFP_KERNEL);
> + fid = kzalloc(sizeof(*fid), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!fid)
> return NULL;
>
> - memset(&fid->qid, 0, sizeof(fid->qid));
> fid->mode = -1;
> fid->uid = current_fsuid();
> fid->clnt = clnt;
> - fid->rdir = NULL;
> - fid->fid = 0;
> refcount_set(&fid->count, 1);
>
> idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-10 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-10 14:14 [PATCH v2] net/9p: Initialize the iounit field during fid creation Tyler Hicks
2022-07-10 14:48 ` Christian Schoenebeck [this message]
2022-07-15 22:23 ` Dominique Martinet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1984068.YOKu8ataPd@silver \
--to=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).