From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3E8C76196 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 11:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232477AbjDCLaS convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2023 07:30:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35920 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231626AbjDCLaR (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2023 07:30:17 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com (mail-wr1-f41.google.com [209.85.221.41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEF32903C for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 04:30:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id y14so29001506wrq.4 for ; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 04:30:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680521408; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4aFFFiR94sZ/jVqAegTdqg++sQP+GIHewIM+7z7rxYg=; b=b95qtuZhUhQ/dwlZgGkqzYL659tWCsSaSgTs6RBaLXDlaU0YRb4z9DFrawMo34N/+a ug28V7Tv28Qph7GE2Gp/gf9LANKq2oRYoY3WnhGKL25cwoMSydblHuZ7O1tQR99jjKnS ikBvY2OpQ61RrVmR/ro69FAL8eYNmqOUt+MdNWllvuWj7nlKTdHaGodkVCfs+fVA9PkS NXyFqQl3wC8nPinmr2+9R8iAz6jUXKxIAD1ViDSaV5XjGMmnXU6168H1kcih+PdOigBf u5cNVEWW0ZSo5DRs+QCje/CgzZCdARyxDDuR30elRujpRHKIsip3TM5Wuosu9jzlSiYD 5vEA== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9dNqAQ/LVXah3ytJ3YSK9IHIZPgQHaBzKML7WU1KNm/k08z9cqO YrBdmU2p9XpYj5XbFQg73Fk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZHJ5Q8PqXl5Gt0Hd67A19QbgCfbmBa1zNMwc5lBuv0bzfNt9ZoktZHPeYLKoPzA/jDgqImFw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ce81:0:b0:2ce:a65e:817f with SMTP id r1-20020adfce81000000b002cea65e817fmr12164373wrn.25.1680521407671; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 04:30:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.148.83.3] (business-89-135-192-225.business.broadband.hu. [89.135.192.225]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x6-20020a5d60c6000000b002dfca33ba36sm9553057wrt.8.2023.04.03.04.30.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 03 Apr 2023 04:30:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1998a6a01c5f1905f0f4e1e72d4e19500fc352d1.camel@inf.elte.hu> Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 0/9] Add tc-mqprio and tc-taprio support for preemptible traffic classes From: Ferenc Fejes To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern , Stephen Hemminger , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E9ter?= Antal Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 13:30:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20230403112348.patphgia5en6v2ec@skbuf> References: <20230403105245.2902376-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> <6546e93dca588c3c01e56466e6f5ae10e37870bf.camel@gmail.com> <20230403112348.patphgia5en6v2ec@skbuf> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Hi Vladimir! On Mon, 2023-04-03 at 14:23 +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > Hi Ferenc, > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 01:18:07PM +0200, Ferenc Fejes wrote: > > Seems like Stephen merged Péter's manpages patch [1] but IMO your > > version [2] is a better overhaul of that, also Péter ACK-ed to go > > forward with that version. Looks like you rebased this work on the > > new > > manpages, you have any plan to submit the changes from [2] > > separately? > > Probably Stephen missed the whole discussion and about [2] and I'm > > admit that putting acked/reviewed into a mail inside the discussion > > might be misleading (probably thats show up for the original patch > > in > > patchwork). Sorry for making it complicated. > > [1] > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/167789641838.26474.2747633103367439718.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org/ > > > > [2] > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230220161809.t2vj6daixio7uzbw@skbuf/ > > Yes, this is true. I still have the delta between Péter's merged > version > and my suggested changes, but it needs to be broken up into a > gazillion > smaller patches which I haven't done yet. I now also doubt the value > of > some of those changes as standalone patches. I wanted to get the > preemption > stuff over with first, and this is why I've submitted only what I > have. Understandable, thanks for the info. With all respect of your time, it would be nice if those changes make their way into the manpages in one way or another. I think it has enough value in its own too, but I agree it has much lower prio than having FP merged and running :-) Ferenc