From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
To: John Dykstra <john.dykstra1@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: net: uninitialized loopback addr leaks to userspace
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:00:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19f34abd0906080300w796c6b65o6b537064cac917b0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244408607.9064.8.camel@Maple>
2009/6/7 John Dykstra <john.dykstra1@gmail.com>:
> On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 22:23 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
>> It seems that loopback's hardware address is never initialized by the
>> kernel. So if userspace attempts to read this address before it has
>> been set, the kernel will return some uninitialized data (only 6
>> bytes, though).
>
> Thank you for the report, Vegard.
>
> I've been unable to reproduce the problem you describe, using
> 2.6-30-rc8, this test program and a couple of kernel builds for system
> load:
[...]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Looking at the kernel code, it appears that all bytes of struct
> net_device, including the L2 address, are initialized to zeros at
> interface creation time.
>
> Can you spot a difference between your test procedures and mine that
> would enable me to reproduce the problem?
Hi,
I just tried your test program on a linux-next kernel, it works beautifully :-)
(I made one change: The stack grows downwards on x86, so I think you
should put child_stack + 16386 as the stack to clone()?)
As I wrote in reply to Stephen Hemminger, this problem seems to be
caused by a particular patch in linux-next:
commit f001fde5eadd915f4858d22ed70d7040f48767cf
Author: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
Date: Tue May 5 02:48:28 2009 +0000
net: introduce a list of device addresses dev_addr_list (v6)
Thanks for testing.
Vegard
--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-08 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-30 20:23 net: uninitialized loopback addr leaks to userspace Vegard Nossum
2009-06-07 21:03 ` John Dykstra
2009-06-08 10:00 ` Vegard Nossum [this message]
2009-06-08 10:44 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: loopback device dev->addr_len fix Eric Dumazet
2009-06-08 12:13 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: dev_addr_init() fix Eric Dumazet
2009-06-08 12:41 ` Jiri Pirko
2009-06-08 13:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-08 13:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-09 12:21 ` David Miller
2009-06-07 23:11 ` net: uninitialized loopback addr leaks to userspace Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-08 9:16 ` Vegard Nossum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19f34abd0906080300w796c6b65o6b537064cac917b0@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
--cc=john.dykstra1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).