From: "Manu Abraham" <abraham.manu@gmail.com>
To: "Dave Dillow" <dave@thedillows.org>
Cc: "Evgeniy Polyakov" <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Distributed storage.
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 07:44:48 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a297b360708032044q4e2fa558s576478e3e75308bf@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1186195868.16431.5.camel@obelisk.thedillows.org>
On 8/4/07, Dave Dillow <dave@thedillows.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 09:04 +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
> > On 7/31/07, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> wrote:
> >
> > > TODO list currently includes following main items:
> > > * redundancy algorithm (drop me a request of your own, but it is highly
> > > unlikley that Reed-Solomon based will ever be used - it is too slow
> > > for distributed RAID, I consider WEAVER codes)
> >
> >
> > LDPC codes[1][2] have been replacing Turbo code[3] with regards to
> > communication links and we have been seeing that transition. (maybe
> > helpful, came to mind seeing the mention of Turbo code) Don't know how
> > weaver compares to LDPC, though found some comparisons [4][5] But
> > looking at fault tolerance figures, i guess Weaver is much better.
> >
> > [1] http://www.ldpc-codes.com/
> > [2] http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1240497
> > [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbo_code
> > [4] http://domino.research.ibm.com/library/cyberdig.nsf/papers/BD559022A190D41C85257212006CEC11/$File/rj10391.pdf
> > [5] http://hplabs.hp.com/personal/Jay_Wylie/publications/wylie_dsn2007.pdf
>
> Searching Google for Dr. Plank's work at the University of TN turns up
> some analysis of using LDPC codes in storage systems.
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=plank+ldpc&btnG=Google+Search
>
> Patents are an issue to watch out for around the use of Tornado/Raptor
> codes. I've not researched it, but I believe there be dragons there.
>
We don't use the code in the driver straight away [2] (in the case
that i mentioned), since that happens in the hardware (demodulator
chip) [1], but we have an interface for selecting the code-rate [2]
(LDPC/BCH) for DVB-S2 and the new papers for DVB-T2 looks geared that
the base decision is to use LDPC.
Though i now see a patent application for it [3]. Not sure whether it
is a registered patent, i am under an agreement of Non-Disclosure with
STM. Will ask the relevant person there, whether they have it
registered. (Most probably they may have it registered).
There are a few people from STM on LK, if not they can possibly
confirm whether the patent is regsitered or not.
[1] http://www2.dac.com/data2/42nd/42acceptedpapers.nsf/0c4c09c6ffa905c487256b7b007afb72/998f93e4b29e99fa87256fc400714617/$FILE/33_1.pdf
[2] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~manu/stb0899-c5/file/760cb230695c/linux/include/linux/dvb/frontend.h
[3] http://www.freepatentsonline.com/20060206779.html
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/20060206778.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-04 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-31 17:13 Distributed storage Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-02 21:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-03 10:26 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-03 10:57 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-03 12:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-03 13:49 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-03 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-03 19:48 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-03 19:41 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-04 1:19 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-04 16:37 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-05 8:04 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-05 15:08 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-05 21:23 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-06 8:25 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-07 12:05 ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-07 18:24 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-07 20:55 ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-08 9:54 ` Block device throttling [Re: Distributed storage.] Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-08 10:17 ` [1/1] " Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-08 13:28 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-12 23:16 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-13 8:18 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-27 21:57 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-13 5:22 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-13 5:36 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-13 6:44 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-13 8:14 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-13 11:04 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-13 12:04 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-13 12:18 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-13 12:24 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-13 8:23 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-13 11:18 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-13 12:18 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-13 13:04 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-14 8:46 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-14 11:13 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-14 11:30 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-14 11:35 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-14 11:50 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-14 12:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-14 12:46 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-14 12:54 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-12 23:36 ` Distributed storage Daniel Phillips
2007-08-13 7:28 ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-13 7:45 ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-13 9:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-13 9:13 ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-13 9:55 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-13 10:06 ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-13 10:15 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-13 10:22 ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-13 10:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-13 9:18 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-13 10:12 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-13 11:03 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-13 11:45 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-13 8:59 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-13 9:12 ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-13 23:27 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-03 4:09 ` Mike Snitzer
2007-08-03 10:42 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-04 0:49 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-03 5:04 ` Manu Abraham
2007-08-03 10:44 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-04 2:51 ` Dave Dillow
2007-08-04 3:44 ` Manu Abraham [this message]
2007-08-04 17:03 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-04 0:41 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-04 16:44 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-05 8:06 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-05 15:01 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-05 21:35 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-06 8:28 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
[not found] ` <200708281027.59528.phillips@phunq.net>
[not found] ` <20070828175403.GA28440@2ka.mipt.ru>
[not found] ` <200708281408.06618.phillips@phunq.net>
2007-08-29 8:53 ` [1/1] Block device throttling [Re: Distributed storage.] Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-30 23:20 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-31 17:33 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-31 21:41 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-09-02 4:42 ` Daniel Phillips
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-27 16:07 Distributed STorage Evgeniy Polyakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1a297b360708032044q4e2fa558s576478e3e75308bf@mail.gmail.com \
--to=abraham.manu@gmail.com \
--cc=dave@thedillows.org \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).