netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] amd-xgbe: Fix jumbo MTU processing on newer hardware
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:52:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b4a099a-66a8-3fdb-01ed-bc110756244a@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170315.154149.1161814285370679300.davem@davemloft.net>

On 3/15/2017 5:41 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:40:51 -0500
>
>> On 3/15/2017 5:37 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:11:23 -0500
>>>
>>>> Newer hardware does not provide a cumulative payload length when
>>>> multiple
>>>> descriptors are needed to handle the data. Once the MTU increases
>>>> beyond
>>>> the size that can be handled by a single descriptor, the SKB does not
>>>> get
>>>> built properly by the driver.
>>>>
>>>> The driver will now calculate the size of the data buffers used by the
>>>> hardware.  The first buffer of the first descriptor is for packet
>>>> headers
>>>> or packet headers and data when the headers can't be split. Subsequent
>>>> descriptors in a multi-descriptor chain will not use the first
>>>> buffer. The
>>>> second buffer is used by all the descriptors in the chain for payload
>>>> data.
>>>> Based on whether the driver is processing the first, intermediate, or
>>>> last
>>>> descriptor it can calculate the buffer usage and build the SKB
>>>> properly.
>>>>
>>>> Tested and verified on both old and new hardware.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks Tom.
>>
>> Thanks David.  This is another patch for 4.10 stable. Can you please
>> queue it up?
>
> Can you properly state this in your patch postings, instead of always
> mentioning it later?
>

Sorry, yes, I can do that.  I didn't realize you preferred it that way.
Do you want the "Cc" tag to stable included in the patch or just
mention the stable targets in the patch description?  I know you
coordinate the stable submissions and I don't want to mess anything up.

Thanks,
Tom


> Thank you.
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-15 22:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-15 20:11 [PATCH net] amd-xgbe: Fix jumbo MTU processing on newer hardware Tom Lendacky
2017-03-15 22:37 ` David Miller
2017-03-15 22:40   ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-15 22:41     ` David Miller
2017-03-15 22:52       ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2017-03-15 23:11         ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-15 23:43         ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1b4a099a-66a8-3fdb-01ed-bc110756244a@amd.com \
    --to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).