From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Borkmann Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/11] bpf: avoid retpoline for lookup/update/delete calls on maps Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 21:45:29 +0200 Message-ID: <1da2f07b-8918-9801-a327-c81e77ee87d9@iogearbox.net> References: <20180602210641.6163-1-daniel@iogearbox.net> <20180602210641.6163-6-daniel@iogearbox.net> <20180603085651.73c76704@redhat.com> <20180603190855.53447a7d@redhat.com> <20180604110225.GX11363@tatos.vnet> <20180604112524.1d5732e8@cakuba.netronome.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer , alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski , Quentin Monnet To: Jakub Kicinski , Phil Sutter Return-path: Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:35225 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750997AbeFDTpc (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:45:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20180604112524.1d5732e8@cakuba.netronome.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/04/2018 08:25 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: [...] > We prefer to have both :) Those of us who like to abbreviate can do > that, and others can use completions. I personally think Quentin did > an awesome job on the completions, they cover the entire syntax unlike > the iproute2 ones and we intend to keep them that way! Fully agree, both make sense. Personally, I only use abbreviations on bpftool so far. :)