From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: RDS: TCP: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in rds_tcp_init_net() Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 16:32:58 +0200 Message-ID: <1e1a5d08-34a7-1b88-80ac-c650c4ae76cf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <44b46c51-3665-5f14-dd3b-6e6f230258a7@users.sourceforge.net> <5d523cf8-1540-e704-2301-a5e0205cb536@users.sourceforge.net> <20170522142651.GA29434@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , Santosh Shilimkar , LKML To: Sowmini Varadhan , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170522142651.GA29434@oracle.com> Content-Language: en-GB Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org >> Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function. > > The change itself is harmless, but I'm curious about the "extra" > part: "extra" from what? If this happens, hopefully this will be logged > somewhere? Note that this type of (infrequent) logging noise is useful > in some cases, e.g., with 8ce675ff, when one is trying to do the > post-mortem of where things first went wrong. Do you find information from a Linux allocation failure report sufficient for such an use case? Regards, Markus