From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John Heffner" Subject: Re: Socket buffer sizes with autotuning Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:28:16 -0700 Message-ID: <1e41a3230804281628r363f9d3cn7b0eee0bd6423e65@mail.gmail.com> References: <1e41a3230804240932u510609beh8fb577baaadeb9bd@mail.gmail.com> <20080424.234628.170849475.davem@davemloft.net> <1e41a3230804281221s11442a82j55c363116988a5cb@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, rick.jones2@hp.com To: "Jerry Chu" Return-path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.180]:27879 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753453AbYD1X2R (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:28:17 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m16so8349397waf.23 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:28:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Jerry Chu wrote: > > Try this series of patches, against net-next. > > Ah, you already know about this problem. Yes it does the trick. I had not actually known about this. (Just cooked up the patches after I saw your mail.) This looks to me like a clear bug. After looking carefully at the code there, it seems there was another small problem, too, though not likely to have much effect. Dave, can you apply the patches I just sent? Thanks, -John