From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: Latest net-next kernel 4.19.0+ Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 19:53:18 -0700 Message-ID: <1e954663-ed05-4f33-4384-db880844f9d1@gmail.com> References: <59d5657c-ea0a-7b64-d5ff-5b55eb4fcccf@itcare.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers To: Cong Wang , =?UTF-8?Q?Pawe=c5=82_Staszewski?= Return-path: Received: from mail-pg1-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:43562 "EHLO mail-pg1-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725988AbeJ3Loz (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2018 07:44:55 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f169.google.com with SMTP id n10-v6so4855071pgv.10 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 19:53:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/29/2018 07:27 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 5:19 PM Paweł Staszewski wrote: >> >> Sorry not complete - followed by hw csum: >> >> [ 342.190831] vlan1490: hw csum failure >> [ 342.190835] CPU: 52 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/52 Not tainted 4.19.0+ #1 >> [ 342.190836] Call Trace: >> [ 342.190839] >> [ 342.190849] dump_stack+0x46/0x5b >> [ 342.190856] __skb_checksum_complete+0x9a/0xa0 >> [ 342.190859] tcp_v4_rcv+0xef/0x960 >> [ 342.190864] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x49/0xd0 >> [ 342.190866] ip_local_deliver+0x5e/0xe0 >> [ 342.190869] ? ip_sublist_rcv_finish+0x50/0x50 >> [ 342.190870] ip_rcv+0x41/0xc0 >> [ 342.190874] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x4b/0x70 >> [ 342.190877] netif_receive_skb_internal+0x2f/0xd0 >> [ 342.190879] napi_gro_receive+0xb7/0xe0 >> [ 342.190884] mlx5e_handle_rx_cqe+0x7a/0xd0 >> [ 342.190886] mlx5e_poll_rx_cq+0xc6/0x930 >> [ 342.190888] mlx5e_napi_poll+0xab/0xc90 > > > We got exactly the same backtrace in our data center. However, > it is not easy for us to reproduce it, do you have any clue to reproduce it? > > If you do, try to tcpdump the packets triggering this warning, it could > be useful for debugging. > > Also, we tried to apply commit d55bef5059dd057bd, the warning _still_ > occurs. We tried to revert the offending commit 88078d98d1bb, it > disappears. So it is likely that commit 88078d98d1bb introduces > more troubles than the one fixed by d55bef5059dd057bd. > Or this could be that mlx5 driver is buggy when dealing with VLAN tags. It both uses vlan_tci (hardware vlan offload) in skb _and_ this piece of code in mlx5e_handle_csum() if (network_depth > ETH_HLEN) /* CQE csum is calculated from the IP header and does * not cover VLAN headers (if present). This will add * the checksum manually. */ skb->csum = csum_partial(skb->data + ETH_HLEN, network_depth - ETH_HLEN, skb->csum); That seems strange to me, because skb_vlan_untag() will not adjust skb->csum in this case.