From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2-xthvdsQ13ZrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Carsten Otte <cotte-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
lguest-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
Shirley Ma <xma-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-s390-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
habanero-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org,
Heiko Carstens
<heiko.carstens-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
virtualization-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
steved-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
Christian Borntraeger
<borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Tom Lendacky
<tahm-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky
<schwidefsky-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
linux390-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 3/3] virtio_net: limit xmit polling
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 12:50:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ec8eec325839ecf2eac9930a230361e7956047c.1306921434.git.mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1306921434.git.mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Current code might introduce a lot of latency variation
if there are many pending bufs at the time we
attempt to transmit a new one. This is bad for
real-time applications and can't be good for TCP either.
Free up just enough to both clean up all buffers
eventually and to be able to xmit the next packet.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index a0ee78d..6045510 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -509,17 +509,27 @@ again:
return received;
}
-static void free_old_xmit_skbs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
+/* Check capacity and try to free enough pending old buffers to enable queueing
+ * new ones. If min_skbs > 0, try to free at least the specified number of skbs
+ * even if the ring already has sufficient capacity. Return true if we can
+ * guarantee that a following virtqueue_add_buf will succeed. */
+static bool free_old_xmit_skbs(struct virtnet_info *vi, int min_skbs)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
unsigned int len;
+ bool r;
- while ((skb = virtqueue_get_buf(vi->svq, &len)) != NULL) {
+ while ((r = virtqueue_min_capacity(vi->svq) < MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2) ||
+ min_skbs-- > 0) {
+ skb = virtqueue_get_buf(vi->svq, &len);
+ if (unlikely(!skb))
+ break;
pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
vi->dev->stats.tx_bytes += skb->len;
vi->dev->stats.tx_packets++;
dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
}
+ return r;
}
static int xmit_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct sk_buff *skb)
@@ -572,27 +582,24 @@ static int xmit_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct sk_buff *skb)
static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
{
struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
- int capacity;
+ int ret, n;
- /* Free up any pending old buffers before queueing new ones. */
- free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
+ /* Free up space in the ring in case this is the first time we get
+ * woken up after ring full condition. Note: this might try to free
+ * more than strictly necessary if the skb has a small
+ * number of fragments, but keep it simple. */
+ free_old_xmit_skbs(vi, 0);
/* Try to transmit */
- capacity = xmit_skb(vi, skb);
-
- /* This can happen with OOM and indirect buffers. */
- if (unlikely(capacity < 0)) {
- if (net_ratelimit()) {
- if (likely(capacity == -ENOMEM)) {
- dev_warn(&dev->dev,
- "TX queue failure: out of memory\n");
- } else {
- dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;
- dev_warn(&dev->dev,
- "Unexpected TX queue failure: %d\n",
- capacity);
- }
- }
+ ret = xmit_skb(vi, skb);
+
+ /* Failure to queue is unlikely. It's not a bug though: it might happen
+ * if we get an interrupt while the queue is still mostly full.
+ * We could stop the queue and re-enable callbacks (and possibly return
+ * TX_BUSY), but as this should be rare, we don't bother. */
+ if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
+ if (net_ratelimit())
+ dev_info(&dev->dev, "TX queue failure: %d\n", ret);
dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
kfree_skb(skb);
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
@@ -603,15 +610,16 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
skb_orphan(skb);
nf_reset(skb);
- /* Apparently nice girls don't return TX_BUSY; stop the queue
- * before it gets out of hand. Naturally, this wastes entries. */
- if (capacity < 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
+ /* Apparently nice girls don't return TX_BUSY; check capacity and stop
+ * the queue before it gets out of hand.
+ * Naturally, this wastes entries. */
+ /* We transmit one skb, so try to free at least two pending skbs.
+ * This is so that we don't hog the skb memory unnecessarily. */
+ if (!likely(free_old_xmit_skbs(vi, 2))) {
netif_stop_queue(dev);
if (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(vi->svq))) {
- /* More just got used, free them then recheck. */
- free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
- capacity = virtqueue_min_capacity(vi->svq);
- if (capacity >= 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
+ /* More just got used, free them and recheck. */
+ if (!likely(free_old_xmit_skbs(vi, 0))) {
netif_start_queue(dev);
virtqueue_disable_cb(vi->svq);
}
--
1.7.5.53.gc233e
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-01 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-01 9:49 [PATCH RFC 0/3] virtio and vhost-net capacity handling Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <cover.1306921434.git.mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-01 9:49 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] virtio_ring: add capacity check API Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <8014f898ca6b768d7be626b83c617a1e84adfeb9.1306921434.git.mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-02 2:11 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] ` <87sjrthti1.fsf-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-02 13:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-01 9:49 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] virtio_net: fix tx capacity checks using new API Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <110045d5bf250e6ed9c739f8cc6adbbf54e3cc9c.1306921434.git.mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-02 2:10 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] ` <87vcwphtkd.fsf-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-02 13:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-01 9:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
[not found] ` <1ec8eec325839ecf2eac9930a230361e7956047c.1306921434.git.mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-02 3:54 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] virtio_net: limit xmit polling Rusty Russell
[not found] ` <87pqmwj3am.fsf-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-02 13:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <20110602133425.GJ7141-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-02 14:17 ` Krishna Kumar2
[not found] ` <OF990F08C5.2ECE35B1-ON652578A3.004DC0FA-652578A3.004E3FE4-xthvdsQ13ZrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-02 14:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <20110602144346.GA7995-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-02 15:26 ` Krishna Kumar2
[not found] ` <OFFF109303.D838CAE2-ON652578A3.0053357D-652578A3.00549366-xthvdsQ13ZrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-02 15:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-03 4:08 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-06-02 15:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ec8eec325839ecf2eac9930a230361e7956047c.1306921434.git.mst@redhat.com \
--to=mst-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cotte-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=habanero-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=krkumar2-xthvdsQ13ZrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lguest-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-s390-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux390-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=schwidefsky-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=steved-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tahm-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=virtualization-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=xma-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).