From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@realtek.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/2] r8169: improve rtl_rx
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 01:00:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ede7930-0018-49dc-b63a-7c77dd4b367b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf2db26b-5188-7311-a89a-32fafcd653ac@gmail.com>
There's no need to check min(budget, NUM_RX_DESC). At first budget
(NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT = 64) is less then NUM_RX_DESC (256).
And more important: Even in case of budget > NUM_RX_DESC we could
safely continue processing descriptors as long as they are owned by
the CPU. In addition replace rx_left with a normal counter variable,
this allows to simplify the code. Last but not least there's no need
any longer to pass the budget as an u32.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 15 +++++----------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
index 3ef1b31c9..3ea27a657 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
@@ -4415,15 +4415,13 @@ static inline void rtl8169_rx_csum(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 opts1)
skb_checksum_none_assert(skb);
}
-static int rtl_rx(struct net_device *dev, struct rtl8169_private *tp, u32 budget)
+static int rtl_rx(struct net_device *dev, struct rtl8169_private *tp, int budget)
{
- unsigned int cur_rx, rx_left, count;
struct device *d = tp_to_dev(tp);
+ int count;
- cur_rx = tp->cur_rx;
-
- for (rx_left = min(budget, NUM_RX_DESC); rx_left > 0; rx_left--, cur_rx++) {
- unsigned int pkt_size, entry = cur_rx % NUM_RX_DESC;
+ for (count = 0; count < budget; count++, tp->cur_rx++) {
+ unsigned int pkt_size, entry = tp->cur_rx % NUM_RX_DESC;
struct RxDesc *desc = tp->RxDescArray + entry;
struct sk_buff *skb;
const void *rx_buf;
@@ -4500,9 +4498,6 @@ static int rtl_rx(struct net_device *dev, struct rtl8169_private *tp, u32 budget
rtl8169_mark_to_asic(desc);
}
- count = cur_rx - tp->cur_rx;
- tp->cur_rx = cur_rx;
-
return count;
}
@@ -4561,7 +4556,7 @@ static int rtl8169_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
struct net_device *dev = tp->dev;
int work_done;
- work_done = rtl_rx(dev, tp, (u32) budget);
+ work_done = rtl_rx(dev, tp, budget);
rtl_tx(dev, tp, budget);
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-06 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-05 23:58 [PATCH net-next 0/2] r8169: improve rtl_rx and NUM_RX_DESC handling Heiner Kallweit
2020-12-06 0:00 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2020-12-06 0:00 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] r8169: make NUM_RX_DESC a signed int Heiner Kallweit
2020-12-06 0:32 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] r8169: improve rtl_rx and NUM_RX_DESC handling David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ede7930-0018-49dc-b63a-7c77dd4b367b@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).