From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grygorii Strashko Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: add support for ext rftclk selection Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 14:40:48 -0600 Message-ID: <1f0c1579-7b9a-49a4-c3b4-79c40051b9fd@ti.com> References: <20161128230428.6872-1-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <20161128230428.6872-3-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <20161130095632.GC28680@localhost.localdomain> <11994fbc-3713-6ef7-8a44-8a2442106dfc@ti.com> <20161206202558.GB23605@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Murali Karicheri , "David S. Miller" , , Mugunthan V N , Sekhar Nori , , , Rob Herring , , Wingman Kwok , To: Richard Cochran Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20161206202558.GB23605-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 12/06/2016 02:25 PM, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 01:39:40PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >> I come with below RFC patch. if no objection I'll move forward with it. > > Thanks for following through with this! > > The am335x will also need the MUX in its clock tree, won't it? > Not exactly. I do not see CPTS_RFTCLK_SEL register in trm, but looks like it's already implemented in am335 clock tree: cpsw_cpts_rft_clk: cpsw_cpts_rft_clk@520 { #clock-cells = <0>; compatible = "ti,mux-clock"; clocks = <&dpll_core_m5_ck>, <&dpll_core_m4_ck>; reg = <0x0520>; }; and ssigned-clock-xx can be used to change parent in board file: &cpsw_cpts_rft_clk { assigned-clocks = <&cpsw_cpts_rft_clk>; assigned-clock-parents = <&dpll_core_m4_ck>; }; -- regards, -grygorii -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html