From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>,
Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/11] tcp: allow mptcp to drop TS for some packets
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 16:52:25 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1f3aea3b-1bb0-4584-8f6d-af14d73df81d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iLdwhhwLyO6zRjWMEY3t9g60ZE8ZhOVx33ucg_uRETbmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Eric,
Thank you for the review!
On 01/06/2026 16:04, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2026 at 10:25 PM Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
> <matttbe@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> With TCP-timestamps (padded) taking 12 bytes and ADD_ADDR IPv6 + port
>> taking 30 bytes, the 40-byte limit for the TCP options is reached. In
>> this case, it is then not possible to send the address signal.
>>
>> The idea is to let MPTCP dropping the TCP-timestamps option for some
>> specific packets, to be able to send some specific pure ACK carrying >28
>> bytes of MPTCP options, like with this specific ADD_ADDR. A new
>> parameter is passed from tcp_established_options to the MPTCP side to
>> indicate if the TCP TS option is used, and if it should be dropped. The
>> next commit implements the part on MPTCP side, but split into two
>> patches to help TCP maintainers to identify the modifications on TCP
>> side. This feature will be controlled by a new add_addr_v6_port_drop_ts
>> MPTCP sysctl knob.
>>
>> It is important to keep in mind that dropping the TCP timestamps option
>> for one packet of the connection could eventually disrupt some
>> middleboxes: even if it should be unlikely, they could drop the packet
>> or even block the connection. That's why this new feature will be
>> controlled by a sysctl knob.
>>
>> Note that it would be technically possible to squeeze both options into
>> the header if the ADD_ADDR is first written, and then the TCP timestamps
>> without the NOPs preceding it. But this means more modifications on TCP
>> side, plus some middleboxes could still be disrupted by that.
>>
>> About the implementation, instead of passing a new boolean (drop_ts),
>> another option would be to pass the whole option structure (opts),
>> but 'struct tcp_out_options' is currently defined in tcp_output.c, and
>> would need to be exported. Plus that means the removal of the TCP TS
>> option would be done on the MPTCP side, and not here on the TCP side.
>> It feels clearer to remove other TCP options from the TCP side, than
>> hiding that from the MPTCP side.
>>
>> Yet an other alternative would be to pass the size already taken by the
>> other TCP options, and have a way to drop them all when needed. But this
>> feels better to target only the timestamps option where dropping it
>> should be safe, even if it is currently the only option that would be
>> set before MPTCP, when MPTCP is used.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
>> To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/mptcp.h | 3 ++-
>> net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 6 +++++-
>> net/mptcp/options.c | 3 ++-
>> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/mptcp.h b/include/net/mptcp.h
>> index f7263fe2a2e4..000b6593bfa4 100644
>> --- a/include/net/mptcp.h
>> +++ b/include/net/mptcp.h
>> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ bool mptcp_synack_options(const struct request_sock *req, unsigned int *size,
>> struct mptcp_out_options *opts);
>> bool mptcp_established_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> unsigned int *size, unsigned int remaining,
>> - struct mptcp_out_options *opts);
>> + bool *drop_ts, struct mptcp_out_options *opts);
>> bool mptcp_incoming_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
>>
>> void mptcp_write_options(struct tcphdr *th, __be32 *ptr, struct tcp_sock *tp,
>> @@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ static inline bool mptcp_established_options(struct sock *sk,
>> struct sk_buff *skb,
>> unsigned int *size,
>> unsigned int remaining,
>> + bool *drop_ts,
>> struct mptcp_out_options *opts)
>> {
>> return false;
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>> index ef0c10cd31c7..53ee4c8f5f8c 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>> @@ -1181,12 +1181,16 @@ static unsigned int tcp_established_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb
>> */
>> if (sk_is_mptcp(sk)) {
>> unsigned int remaining = MAX_TCP_OPTION_SPACE - size;
>> + bool drop_ts = opts->options & OPTION_TS;
>> unsigned int opt_size = 0;
>>
>> if (mptcp_established_options(sk, skb, &opt_size, remaining,
>> - &opts->mptcp)) {
>> + &drop_ts, &opts->mptcp)) {
>> opts->options |= OPTION_MPTCP;
>> size += opt_size;
>> +
>> + if (drop_ts)
>> + opts->options &= ~OPTION_TS;
>> }
>> }
>
> Passing local variables' addresses forces the compiler to use a stack
> canary in this hot function, even for non-MPTCP flows.
>
> I was about to test the following patch, which removes the current
> stack canary caused by MPTCP :/
Sorry, I didn't know you were planning to do that.
Would that be OK for you if I use an unused bit in opts->mptcp? It's a
bit "hackish", but it avoids adding a new local variable address. Or do
you have another idea?
The modifications in net/ipv4/tcp_output.c would then be limited to:
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index ef0c10cd31c7..f4edc9c4f3fc 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -1181,12 +1181,18 @@ static unsigned int tcp_established_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb
*/
if (sk_is_mptcp(sk)) {
unsigned int remaining = MAX_TCP_OPTION_SPACE - size;
+ bool has_ts = opts->options & OPTION_TS;
unsigned int opt_size = 0;
if (mptcp_established_options(sk, skb, &opt_size, remaining,
- &opts->mptcp)) {
+ has_ts, &opts->mptcp)) {
opts->options |= OPTION_MPTCP;
size += opt_size;
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP)
+ if (opts->mptcp.drop_ts)
+ opts->options &= ~OPTION_TS;
+#endif
}
}
I can also avoid adding a new parameter in mptcp_established_options
(bool has_ts) by setting opts->mptcp.drop_ts before calling it, but
that's clearer with this new parameter I think.
> $ scripts/bloat-o-meter -t vmlinux.old vmlinux.new
> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/3 up/down: 0/-92 (-92)
> Function old new delta
> tcp_options_write.isra 1423 1407 -16
> mptcp_established_options 2746 2720 -26
> tcp_established_options 553 503 -50
> Total: Before=22110750, After=22110658, chg -0.00%
>
Good reduction!
(...)
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> index ef0c10cd31c71ff585a937fde37f2b08b1214b5a..594ec6ba02d5413d43842f79aefbf4d8355c4f3f
> 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> @@ -1183,10 +1183,11 @@ static unsigned int
> tcp_established_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb
> unsigned int remaining = MAX_TCP_OPTION_SPACE - size;
> unsigned int opt_size = 0;
>
> - if (mptcp_established_options(sk, skb, &opt_size, remaining,
> - &opts->mptcp)) {
> + opt_size = mptcp_established_options(sk, skb, remaining,
> + &opts->mptcp);
> + if (opt_size) {
> opts->options |= OPTION_MPTCP;
> - size += opt_size;
> + size += (opt_size & 63);
Nice trick! What about returning a negative number when the MPTCP option
is not needed? Just to avoid playing with masks in the code?
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-01 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-01 5:22 [PATCH net-next 00/11] mptcp: pm: drop TCP TS with ADD_ADDRv6 + port Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-06-01 5:22 ` [PATCH net-next 01/11] mptcp: options: suboptions sizes can be negative Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-06-01 5:22 ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] mptcp: pm: avoid computing rm_addr size twice Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-06-01 5:22 ` [PATCH net-next 03/11] mptcp: pm: avoid computing add_addr " Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-06-01 5:22 ` [PATCH net-next 04/11] mptcp: introduce add_addr_v6_port_drop_ts sysctl knob Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-06-01 5:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-06-01 6:04 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-06-01 5:22 ` [PATCH net-next 05/11] tcp: allow mptcp to drop TS for some packets Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-06-01 6:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-06-01 6:52 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2026-06-01 7:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-06-01 7:36 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-06-01 8:07 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-06-01 5:22 ` [PATCH net-next 06/11] mptcp: pm: drop TCP TS with ADD_ADDRv6 + port Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-06-01 5:22 ` [PATCH net-next 07/11] selftests: mptcp: validate ADD_ADDRv6 + TS " Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-06-01 5:22 ` [PATCH net-next 08/11] selftests: mptcp: always check sent/dropped ADD_ADDRs Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-06-01 5:22 ` [PATCH net-next 09/11] selftests: mptcp: connect: test name in pcap file Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-06-01 5:22 ` [PATCH net-next 10/11] selftests: mptcp: simult_flow: " Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-06-01 5:22 ` [PATCH net-next 11/11] selftests: mptcp: pcap: drop most of the payload Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1f3aea3b-1bb0-4584-8f6d-af14d73df81d@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martineau@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox