From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sinan Kaya Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/18] infiniband: cxgb4: Eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 00:25:14 -0400 Message-ID: <1f5e3b14-05a1-08d0-c0cb-00805526448d@codeaurora.org> References: <1521216991-28706-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1521216991-28706-19-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <003601d3bd6a$783d6970$68b83c50$@opengridcomputing.com> <83387f6e-adcb-14e9-2c22-96abf9493cc6@codeaurora.org> <004501d3bd7b$505e70f0$f11b52d0$@opengridcomputing.com> <740c7d45-450e-c9b3-ceed-7bc7fcefbc5a@codeaurora.org> <71e37a55-537b-d75a-cfde-f188b7cfce8e@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 'Steve Wise' , 'Doug Ledford' , 'Jason Gunthorpe' , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 'Michael Werner' , 'Casey Leedom' To: Steve Wise , netdev@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org, sulrich@codeaurora.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <71e37a55-537b-d75a-cfde-f188b7cfce8e@codeaurora.org> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 3/17/2018 12:03 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 3/16/2018 11:40 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote: >> I'll change writel_relaxed() with __raw_writel() in the series like you suggested >> and also look at your other comments. > > I spoke too soon. > > Now that I realized, code needs to follow one of the following patterns for correctness > > 1) > wmb() > writel()/writel_relaxed() > > or > > 2) > wmb() > __raw_wrltel() > mmiowb() > > but definitely not > > wmb() > __raw_wrltel() > > Since #1 == #2, I'll stick to my current implementation of writel_relaxed() > > Changing writel() to writel_relaxed() or __raw_writel() isn't enough. PowerPC needs mmiowb() > for correctness. ARM's mmiowb() implementation is empty. > > So, there is no one size fits all solution with the current state of affairs. > > I think I finally got what you mean. Code seems to have wmb() writel()/writeq() wmb() this can be safely replaced with wmb() __raw_writel()/__raw_writeq() wmb() This will work on all arches. Below is the new version. Let me know if this is OK. +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/t4.h @@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static inline void pio_copy(u64 __iomem *dst, u64 *src) int count = 8; while (count) { - writeq(*src, dst); + __raw_writeq(*src, dst); src++; dst++; count--; @@ -477,15 +477,16 @@ static inline void t4_ring_sq_db(struct t4_wq *wq, u16 inc, union t4_wr *wqe) (u64 *)wqe); } else { pr_debug("DB wq->sq.pidx = %d\n", wq->sq.pidx); - writel(PIDX_T5_V(inc) | QID_V(wq->sq.bar2_qid), - wq->sq.bar2_va + SGE_UDB_KDOORBELL); + __raw_writel(PIDX_T5_V(inc) | QID_V(wq->sq.bar2_qid), + wq->sq.bar2_va + SGE_UDB_KDOORBELL); } /* Flush user doorbell area writes. */ wmb(); return; } - writel(QID_V(wq->sq.qid) | PIDX_V(inc), wq->db); + __raw_writel(QID_V(wq->sq.qid) | PIDX_V(inc), wq->db); + mmiowmb() } static inline void t4_ring_rq_db(struct t4_wq *wq, u16 inc, @@ -502,15 +503,16 @@ static inline void t4_ring_rq_db(struct t4_wq *wq, u16 inc, (void *)wqe); } else { pr_debug("DB wq->rq.pidx = %d\n", wq->rq.pidx); - writel(PIDX_T5_V(inc) | QID_V(wq->rq.bar2_qid), - wq->rq.bar2_va + SGE_UDB_KDOORBELL); + __raw_writel(PIDX_T5_V(inc) | QID_V(wq->rq.bar2_qid), + wq->rq.bar2_va + SGE_UDB_KDOORBELL); } /* Flush user doorbell area writes. */ wmb(); return; } - writel(QID_V(wq->rq.qid) | PIDX_V(inc), wq->db); + __raw_writel(QID_V(wq->rq.qid) | PIDX_V(inc), wq->db); + mmiowmb(); } -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.