netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Schaaf <bof@bof.de>
To: Patrick Schaaf <bof@bof.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
	netfilter-core@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: TODO list before feature freeze
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:45:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020729184520.F570@oknodo.bof.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020729184239.E570@oknodo.bof.de>; from bof@bof.de on Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 06:42:39PM +0200

> This week (probably wednesday) I'll put both my netfilter hook statistic
> patch, and enabled kernel profiling, onto a production box (the transproxy
> thing from the bucket occupation analysis). Right now I have totally
> undersized bucket count on that machine (7168 buckets for 10 times
> the tuples), so I'll first measure the "accidental long list walk"
> situation, and then retry with a suitable bucket size.

Before somebody get the wrong idea: the machine I mentioned, serves
as a squid proxy for over 3000 narrowband dialup users (all web
traffic), and it has no performance problems at all with that.
For all I know, any optimization we may make regarding netfilter,
won't make the squids on that box work perceivably better.

I have permanent average and median service time monitoring to prove
or disprove this assertion :-)

best regards
  Patrick

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-29 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-18  9:34 TODO list before feature freeze Rusty Russell
2002-07-19  7:39 ` Balazs Scheidler
2002-07-19 17:43 ` Michael Richardson
2002-07-29 10:57 ` jamal
2002-07-29 11:12   ` Andi Kleen
2002-07-29 11:23     ` jamal
2002-07-29 11:56       ` Andi Kleen
2002-07-29 15:40         ` Martin Josefsson
2002-07-29 16:15           ` Patrick Schaaf
2002-07-29 17:12             ` Martin Josefsson
2002-07-29 17:35               ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-07-29 22:43         ` Martin Josefsson
2002-07-29 16:26       ` Patrick Schaaf
2002-07-29 16:31         ` Andi Kleen
2002-07-29 16:42           ` Patrick Schaaf
2002-07-29 16:45             ` Patrick Schaaf [this message]
2002-07-30 11:58         ` jamal
2002-07-30 12:27           ` Patrick Schaaf
2002-07-30 12:29             ` jamal
2002-07-30 13:06               ` Patrick Schaaf
2002-07-30 13:42                 ` jamal
2002-07-30 13:08               ` Martin Josefsson
2002-07-30 15:54                 ` Filip Sneppe (Cronos)
2002-07-29 15:25     ` Michael Richardson
2002-07-29 15:52       ` Patrick Schaaf
2002-07-29 20:51       ` Andi Kleen
2002-07-30  7:26         ` Patrick Schaaf
2002-07-29 22:14   ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-30 12:04     ` jamal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020729184520.F570@oknodo.bof.de \
    --to=bof@bof.de \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=netfilter-core@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).