From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Lunz Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c cleanups Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 00:14:03 -0400 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20020919041403.GA10527@orr.falooley.org> References: <20020828185612.GA14342@reflexsecurity.com> <20020828231333.GA15183@reflexsecurity.com> <200209190353.g8J3r5q28456@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, becker@scyld.com, jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, "Patrick R. McManus" Return-path: To: Richard Gooch Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200209190353.g8J3r5q28456@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 9:53PM -0600, Richard Gooch wrote: > - the driver is reporting 10 Mbps rather than 100 Mbps. I've actually > measured eth0 and eth2 and these are delivering 100 Mbps i've noticed this too, and it's probably from all the mucking about I did trying to combine becker's method of forcing duplex/speed with the one in 2.4.19. That stuff is unrelated to the other, more-important merges I did that actually affect how well the card works. Jeff rightly pointed out that I should separate out chunks of the patch for submission, but I haven't had time. This card is still nowhere near working well, even with my patch. It silently drops many frames when simultaneously sending and receiving at high packet rates. It also locks up under load, and is reset in tx_timeout. This happens less frequently with my patch, but is not entirely gone. Also, I need to investigate yet another variation on this driver, as pointed out in http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0209.0/1107.html Jason