From: Eric Lemoine <Eric.Lemoine@ens-lyon.fr>
To: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: udp weirdness
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 08:50:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020924065046.GF392@hookipa> (raw)
I'm observing some UDP weirdness, or I'd better say some UDP behaviour
that I can't explain.
Two machines: one sending a UDP flow (using sendto) and another receiving
this UDP flow (using bind + recv).
When the dgram length is lower that 357 Bytes I observe strange results
at the send side. My home-made udp_tx program gives the following:
$./udp_tx -h 192.168.4.1 -m 357
357 1312621 357.518
357 is the dgram length (in B), 1312621 the number of dgrams sent and
357.518 the perceived thruput (in Mbits/s). The weirdness is that I
get 357.518 Mbits/s whereas the underlying network is 10Mbits/s!
At the receive side the results are consistent (obviously):
$./udp_rx -m 357
357 29519 8.00884
<netstat -s --udp> on the send machine before and after the run also
gives me such a large amount of sent packets (~1312700), whereas
</sbin/ifconfig> confirms that about 29519 packets have been sent
out.
Below 357 Bytes, the same kind of results are observed. Above 357 Bytes,
the results make more sense to me:
$./udp_tx -h 192.168.4.1 -m 358
358 29505 8.04393
$./udp_rx -m 358
358 29468 8.0179
Does anybody know where I lose packets? And why do I lose them only when
the dgram length is below 357 Bytes?
BTW, I'm running 2.4.18-vanilla w/ the 3c59x driver.
Thx.
--
Eric
next reply other threads:[~2002-09-24 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-24 6:50 Eric Lemoine [this message]
2002-09-27 12:02 ` udp weirdness Eric Lemoine
2002-09-27 14:53 ` jamal
2002-09-27 15:04 ` Matti Aarnio
2002-09-29 14:47 ` jamal
2002-09-30 8:49 ` Eric Lemoine
2002-09-30 11:09 ` jamal
2002-09-30 12:10 ` jamal
2002-09-30 12:23 ` jamal
2002-10-01 0:22 ` PATCH " jamal
2002-10-01 6:35 ` Eric Lemoine
2002-10-01 9:51 ` jamal
2002-10-01 13:53 ` kuznet
2002-10-01 14:14 ` jamal
2002-10-01 14:26 ` Chris Friesen
2002-10-01 14:40 ` kuznet
2002-10-01 14:52 ` Chris Friesen
2002-10-01 15:31 ` kuznet
2002-10-01 16:16 ` Chris Friesen
2002-10-01 16:41 ` kuznet
2002-10-01 17:17 ` Chris Friesen
2002-10-01 16:42 ` Ben Greear
2002-10-01 16:58 ` Chris Friesen
2002-10-01 17:55 ` jamal
2002-10-01 18:36 ` Chris Friesen
2002-10-01 18:35 ` jamal
2002-10-01 18:54 ` Ben Greear
2002-10-01 19:03 ` Chris Friesen
2002-10-01 18:52 ` Ben Greear
2002-10-02 11:13 ` Eric Lemoine
2002-10-02 14:09 ` Chris Friesen
2002-10-02 15:25 ` Ben Greear
2002-10-03 15:58 ` Eric Lemoine
2002-10-03 16:29 ` kuznet
2002-09-27 15:19 ` Eric Lemoine
2002-09-27 15:57 ` Eric Lemoine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020924065046.GF392@hookipa \
--to=eric.lemoine@ens-lyon.fr \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).