From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 02:25:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20020927.022515.78074730.davem@redhat.com> References: <20020927.181256.112824147.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, usagi@linux-ipv6.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Return-path: To: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org In-Reply-To: <20020927.181256.112824147.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 18:12:56 +0900 (JST) This patch has problems. @@ -1626,24 +1635,32 @@ for (ifp=inet6_addr_lst[i]; ifp; ifp=ifp->lst_next) { unsigned long age; - if (ifp->flags & IFA_F_PERMANENT) + spin_lock(&ifp->lock); + if (ifp->flags & IFA_F_PERMANENT) { + spin_unlock(&ifp->lock); continue; + } This is completely unnecessary. Nobody modifies the IFA_F_PERMANENT flag after the addr entry has been added to the hash table and this runs under the addrconf hash lock already. Alexey will have to comment on the rest.