From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 06:02:54 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021003.060254.26942488.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200210031306.RAA29293@sex.inr.ac.ru>
From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:06:48 +0400 (MSD)
No, really! __Sharing__ of port space between IPv4 and IPv6 was mad
idea. It cannot generalized to other protocol families.
So, IPV6_V6ONLY is really unique for IPv6. Well, actually, it could
be negated: be default and the option would be called
IPV6_SHARE_THIS_PORT_TO_IPV4.
I think what I want to really say is that I want to provide
way for ipv4 application to say "no ipv6 connections on this
listening socket please".
So does it make no sense at all to have IP_V4ONLY?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-03 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-03 3:13 [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port Number (IPV6_V6ONLY Support) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-03 3:53 ` acme
2002-10-03 3:55 ` acme
2002-10-03 7:00 ` Pekka Savola
2002-10-03 8:29 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-03 8:55 ` Brad Hards
2002-10-03 8:58 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-03 13:06 ` [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same kuznet
2002-10-03 13:02 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-10-03 13:18 ` Pekka Savola
2002-10-03 13:13 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-03 13:01 ` [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port kuznet
2002-10-03 14:15 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-03 14:10 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-03 15:06 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-03 15:04 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-03 15:19 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-03 15:52 ` kuznet
2002-10-23 7:24 ` [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-23 7:23 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-23 7:58 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-23 8:06 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-23 8:02 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-23 7:36 ` Pekka Savola
2002-10-23 10:01 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-23 10:15 ` Pekka Savola
2002-10-23 10:12 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-24 16:24 ` [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both kuznet
2002-10-25 7:46 ` Pekka Savola
2002-10-23 15:53 ` [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port) Kyle C Quest
2002-10-23 16:06 ` Pekka Savola
2002-10-23 16:09 ` Kyle C Quest
2002-10-24 10:24 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021003.060254.26942488.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).