From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, netdev@oss.sgi.com, usagi@linux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 08:04:08 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021003.080408.78030688.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021004.000631.28088811.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:06:31 +0900 (JST)
In article <20021003.231534.83777766.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> (at Thu, 03 Oct 2002 23:15:34 +0900 (JST)), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> says:
> In article <200210031301.RAA29267@sex.inr.ac.ru> (at Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:01:11 +0400 (MSD)), kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru says:
>
> > While doing *_get_port() daddr/dport are _unknown_ and always zero,
> > so it never works.
> >
> > Please, remove these bits, the patch will become simpler.
>
> Ok, I'll do that.
I remember that test for daddr is for existing sockets,
not for socket doing XXX_get_port().
So, I think I don't need to remove that.
Where can daddr/dport be non-zero during get_port()?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-03 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-03 3:13 [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port Number (IPV6_V6ONLY Support) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-03 3:53 ` acme
2002-10-03 3:55 ` acme
2002-10-03 7:00 ` Pekka Savola
2002-10-03 8:29 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-03 8:55 ` Brad Hards
2002-10-03 8:58 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-03 13:06 ` [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same kuznet
2002-10-03 13:02 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-03 13:18 ` Pekka Savola
2002-10-03 13:13 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-03 13:01 ` [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port kuznet
2002-10-03 14:15 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-03 14:10 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-03 15:06 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-03 15:04 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-10-03 15:19 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-03 15:52 ` kuznet
2002-10-23 7:24 ` [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-23 7:23 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-23 7:58 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-23 8:06 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-23 8:02 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-23 7:36 ` Pekka Savola
2002-10-23 10:01 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-23 10:15 ` Pekka Savola
2002-10-23 10:12 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-24 16:24 ` [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both kuznet
2002-10-25 7:46 ` Pekka Savola
2002-10-23 15:53 ` [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port) Kyle C Quest
2002-10-23 16:06 ` Pekka Savola
2002-10-23 16:09 ` Kyle C Quest
2002-10-24 10:24 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021003.080408.78030688.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=usagi@linux-ipv6.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).