From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:06:31 +0900 (JST) Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20021004.000631.28088811.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> References: <20021003.121350.119660876.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <200210031301.RAA29267@sex.inr.ac.ru> <20021003.231534.83777766.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, davem@redhat.com, usagi@linux-ipv6.org Return-path: To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru In-Reply-To: <20021003.231534.83777766.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org In article <20021003.231534.83777766.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> (at Thu, 03 Oct 2002 23:15:34 +0900 (JST)), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 says: > In article <200210031301.RAA29267@sex.inr.ac.ru> (at Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:01:11 +0400 (MSD)), kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru says: > > > While doing *_get_port() daddr/dport are _unknown_ and always zero, > > so it never works. > > > > Please, remove these bits, the patch will become simpler. > > Ok, I'll do that. I remember that test for daddr is for existing sockets, not for socket doing XXX_get_port(). So, I think I don't need to remove that. --yoshfuji