From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: VLAN patches
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 05:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <20021007.050906.62369710.davem@redhat.com>
References: <3DA13332.4080109@mrv.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.30.0210070757520.1861-100000@shell.cyberus.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: emann@mrv.com, greearb@candelatech.com, Bjorn.Andersson@ebc.ericsson.se,
   netdev@oss.sgi.com
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0210070757520.1861-100000@shell.cyberus.ca>
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

   From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
   Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 08:05:07 -0400 (EDT)

   I never liked Bens patches that much compared to the other VLAN
   imp. -- would have prefered a marriage of the two.

There is a long thread deep in the archives for these lists
saying why Ben's code went it.

Please, let's not duplicate that conversation ok?