From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow
 Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port)
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <20021023.002303.67097780.davem@redhat.com>
References: <20021004.001929.03389091.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
	<200210031552.TAA29921@sex.inr.ac.ru>
	<20021023.162439.114324450.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, netdev@oss.sgi.com, usagi@linux-ipv6.org
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
In-Reply-To: <20021023.162439.114324450.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

   From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
   Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:24:39 +0900 (JST)
   
   Well, I've refered alexey's patch and simplified many if-clauses.
   Here's the new patch and test results.  seems ok.

So, because you simplified some if clauses in Alexey's patch, USAGI is
the only entity who deserves credit for the work in the comments?

That's dishonest.  Please fix this.